My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Information/Environmental Scoping Meeting
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
S
>
Sixth Avenue North
>
3960 Sixth Ave N - 29-118-23-33-0009
>
Land Use
>
3960 CR 6 Excel substation
>
Xcel 2011 - File Cabinet 1
>
Public Information/Environmental Scoping Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:26:47 PM
Creation date
9/27/2021 10:10:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3960
Street Name
6th
Street Type
Avenue
Street Direction
North
Address
3960 6th Avenue North
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
2911823330009
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 <br /> 1 you condemn that property and get the substation <br /> 2 further away from the homes and out of the wetland? <br /> 3 MR . CHRIS ROGERS : Chris Rogers , Xcel <br /> 4 Energy . We did look at some alternatives for <br /> 5 alternate substation sites . The challenge is we own <br /> 6 the property that ' s there today . We also need to <br /> 7 connect to the existing transmission line . Some of <br /> 8 the other sites we looked at - - and these were <br /> 9 through Michael Kuruvilla , K- U - R- U -V- I - L- L-A - - and <br /> 10 so we did look at some alternative sites . <br /> 11 One of them was owned by the gun club , we <br /> 12 had another couple parcels that were owned by MnDOT , <br /> 13 I believe . None of those sites panned out . They <br /> 14 were either not large enough or they created a <br /> 15 larger impact by placing the substation further way <br /> 16 and connecting the transmission line . <br /> 17 The substation has been there since 1989 <br /> 18 and we do own property there . So for us to go out <br /> 19 and find another piece of property , it may not be <br /> 20 prudent for our ratepayers . We ' ve got an existing <br /> 21 site here , and as Ed said that the infrastructure is <br /> 22 there . We don ' t want to solve one problem and <br /> 23 create another problem for someone else . And <br /> 24 condemning somebody when we own land today , I don ' t <br /> 25 think that ' s an option at this point . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.