Laserfiche WebLink
Table 14: Calculated Magnetic Fields (mG)for Proposed Orono 115 kV Transmission Line ' <br /> (3.28 feet above ground) <br /> System Current Distance to Proposed Centerline(feet) <br /> Segment Condition (Amps) -300 -200 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 200 300 <br /> Single Pole Peak 250 0.44 0.95 3.14 4.83 8.04 14.30 22.62 19.15 10.94 6.32 3.95 1.09 0.49 <br /> H-Post Vertical <br /> 115 kV Single Circuit Average 150 0.26 0.57 1.89 2.90 4.82 8.58 13.57 11.49 6.37 3.79 2.37 0.65 0.29 <br /> Single Pole Davit Arm Peak 250 0.04 0.11 0.69 1.38 3.18 7.86 12.82 7.74 3.08 1.33 0.66 0.10 0.04 <br /> 115 kV/115kV Double <br /> Circuit Average 150 0.02 0.07 0.42 0.83 1.91 4.72 7.69 4.64 1.85 0.80 0.39 0.06 0.02 <br /> Single Pole Davit Arm <br /> 115 kV/115kV Double Peak 250 0.85 1.57 5.06 8.37 16.37 39.44 69.82 35.80 12.38 5.22 2.60 0.40 0.21 <br /> Circuit Dist. <br /> w/Dist.Under Build Average 150 0.81 1.50 4.77 7.84 15.28 37.17 67.02 34.09 11.81 5.08 2.61 0.45 0.22 <br /> Single Pole Peak 250 0.44 1.00 3.91 6.64 12.95 27.41 38.42 27.68 13.22 6.85 4.08 1.09 0.50 <br /> Y-Frame <br /> 115 kV Single Circuit Average 150 0.26 0.60 2.35 3.99 7.79 16.67 24.0 16.84 7.95 4.11 2.45 0.66 0.30 <br /> Note:The assumed peak and average line loading assumed for these calculations is the estimated flow of 50MVA. <br /> Source:Xcel Energy,June 7,2011;Xcel Energy,personal communication,November 22,2011 <br /> The maximum estimated magnetic field generated by the proposed transmission line would be 38.42 , <br /> mG directly below a 115 kV/115 kV double-circuit transmission centerline at 3.28 feet above <br /> ground, significantly below the 830 mG general public magnetic field guideline established by <br /> ICNIRP. The right-of-way required for the proposed project is 75 feet (37.5 feet on each side of ' <br /> centerline);the highest estimated magnetic field at a distance of 75 feet from the transmission line <br /> centerline would be approximately 1.3 to 1.4 mG. At 300 feet from the transmission centerline the <br /> magnetic field level drops to a maximum of 0.5 mG,at the lower end of the average background <br /> magnetic field of a typical home of 0.5 mG to 4 mG (EPA, 1992). <br /> Based upon current scientific evidence,no adverse effects from electric fields or magnetic fields on <br /> health are expected for persons living or working at locations along or near the proposed project. <br /> The Commission has consistently found that there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate a causal <br /> relationship between EMF exposure and any adverse human health effects. Below are some <br /> references to recent Commission proceedings relating to high-voltage transmission lines and the <br /> issue of electric fields and magnetic fields: <br /> ti <br /> 120. The absence of any demonstrated impact by electric field and magnetic field exposure supports the <br /> conclusion that there is no demonstrated impact on human health and safety. No adverse effects from electric <br /> fields and magnetic fields on health are expected for persons living or working at locations along or near the <br /> proposed Project. (Minnesota Public Utilities Commission,2010,Finding 120) <br /> 40. The issue of electric and magnetic fields was discussed in the environmental assessment. A number <br /> of national and international health agencies(The Minnesota Department of Health, The World Health <br /> Organization, The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences)have generally concluded in their <br /> research that there is insufficient evidence to prove a connection between electric and magnetic fields exposure <br /> and health ffectr. Research has not been able to establish a cause and effect relationship between exposure to <br /> magnetic fields and human disease, nor a plausible biological mechanism by which exposure to electric and <br /> magnetic fields could cause disease. No Minnesota regulations have been established pertaining to magnetic <br /> Environmental Assessment <br /> PUC Docket E002/TL-11-223 Page 36 <br />