Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> The study of cancer in relation to ELF magnetic fields has been a topic of study since the late 1970s. <br /> I Since that time there have been several epidemiological studies that have explored the possible <br /> association of not only cancer risks,including brain tumors,leukemia,and breast cancer,but other <br /> potential human maladies including mental health issues. Studies have focused on both <br /> ' occupational exposures for individuals working in electrical industries and public exposures for <br /> children and adults living and working around common magnetic field sources (in-home wiring, <br /> transmission lines,home and office appliances/equipment). The results of the various studies <br /> conducted over the last three decades,specifically those regarding the relationship between EMF <br /> I <br /> and childhood leukemia and other cancer risks,have been mixed;some have found an association <br /> while others have not(National Cancer Institute,2005). <br /> I Where there is association suggested in epidemiological studies,it is usually very near the statistical <br /> threshold of significance. However,when these studies are repeated in a laboratory,the results have <br /> not reproduced or identified a biological mechanism to support a link between health impacts and <br /> I magnetic fields. Researchers continue to look at magnetic fields until more certain conclusions can <br /> be reached. <br /> I In a 2007 report the World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that,although some studies <br /> have noted a weak statistical link between exposure to EMF and incidence of childhood leukemia, <br /> laboratory evidence does not support these findings and that a similar link has not been noted with <br /> Iother types of cancer: <br /> ... epidemiological evidence is weakened by methodological problems, such as potential selection bias. <br /> I In addition, there are no accepted biophysical mechanisms that would suggest that low-level exposures <br /> are involved in cancer development. ... Additionally, animal studies have been largely negative. <br /> Thus, on balance, the evidence related to childhood leukaemia is not strong enough to be considered <br /> I causal. ... Regarding long-term effects, given the weakness of the evidence for a link between <br /> exposure to ELF[extremely low frequency]magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia, the benefits of <br /> exposure reduction on health are unclear. (WHO,2007) <br /> IAlthough scientists are still debating whether EMF is a hazard to health,at the current time in the <br /> United States,there are no federal standards for occupational or residential exposure to magnetic <br /> I fields. Florida,New York,and Massachusetts are the only three states in the country that have set <br /> standards for magnetic field exposure (Table 10). These standards were not in response to health- <br /> based analysis,but rather on maintaining transmission systems within historic levels. <br /> IThe International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has developed <br /> occupational and residential guidelines for EMF exposure (Table 11). The exposure guidelines <br /> I established by the ICNIRP have typically been the guidelines adopted by most countries and <br /> organizations. They have also concluded that available data regarding potential long-term effects, <br /> such as increased risk of cancer,is insufficient to provide a basis for setting exposure restrictions. <br /> IXcel Energy prepared estimates of magnetic fields for the structure type and voltage at both average <br /> and peak system conditions have been calculated at various distances from the centerline,as <br /> presented in Table 14. <br /> I <br /> UEnvironmental Assessment <br /> PUC Docket E002/TL-11-223 Page 35 <br />