Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br /> Monday,February 1,2021 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Mr. Shurson noted Edwards is absolutely right,they did have conversations with the State DNR and as <br /> that property was being converted to state property they looked to see if they could negotiate the <br /> possibility of an easement through there to allow a trail to connect as described.The DNR pretty <br /> adamantly said that the bylaws for this particular SNA prohibits any kind of paved trail and this new <br /> acquisition would inherit those same bylaws. They looked in more detail to see how feasible it was from <br /> a physical standpoint;the grades are such that it would require a lot of grading, a lot of retaining walls <br /> especially down by the lake and would really destroy the whole nature of the lot. He noted from a <br /> physical and legal standpoint it is not possible,but Three Rivers did explore it. <br /> Hudson asked if all goes well,what would be the projected completion date. <br /> Mr.McCullough said as mentioned earlier,this is a Masterplan so once the plan is completed,then it <br /> becomes eligible for funding. However,this is such a long-term project and vision that it could be 10, 15, <br /> 20 years before a trail like this gets constructed. What is likely to happen in the future is that logical <br /> segments are constructed when opportunities arise and when it makes sense. He clarified that building a <br /> 21 mile-long trail through 7 communities is likely not going to happen in one project. They could be <br /> looking at logical segments getting completed that may piece one regional trail to another or a state trail <br /> to a regional trail,a regional park to a regional trail; places where development is happening, road <br /> reconstruction is taking place,that is typically how Three Rivers puts these together. He noted regarding <br /> timing,they are probably 10-20 years out in terms of construction. <br /> Stephens asked if they went through the preferred route from south to north, it would be W 1,W4,01, <br /> 02, 06, and 08. <br /> Mr. Crosby said that is correct, it would W 1, W4, 01,02, 06,and 08. <br /> Stephens asked if they can explain the optional route a bit better;they wanted to do it in addition to create <br /> neighborhood loops. <br /> Mr. Crosby noted 05 is a challenging section because there is not a lot of room in there but Three Rivers <br /> sees that as a key connector between the existing trail that goes along Highway 112 and connecting up to <br /> what will be the regional trail. If they can get this little piece(noted onscreen)constructed,they have the <br /> opportunity-as there is already an existing trail along Highway 112 -to create these little loops using the <br /> regional trail that would go through the Wood-Rill SNA,the 03 which is on the Luce Line, and the City's <br /> current trail that goes along the roadway;that is one loop. The other loop is the new trail they have going <br /> into town and along the backside of the highway that connects up with Park and the Luce Line. He noted <br /> there would be these two loop systems that would be possible by making this one little connection as part <br /> of the trail plan. <br /> Mr. Shurson noted the next step in the process would be to meet with the City Council and go through a <br /> similar presentation and get their approval on the preferred route. He does not know what the agenda <br /> calls for but it could be some sort of motion towards recommended preferred route to go forward to the <br /> City Council, and that would be Three Rivers' desire. <br /> Carter would be comfortable with that and asked Three Rivers to email the Commissioners that one slide <br /> after the meeting so they have a record of what they say they like. <br /> Page 5 of 13 <br />