Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> � � <br /> I � <br /> �� F� O <br /> ���: C ITY of OROl�TO <br /> � � .� : � <br /> s1: � <br /> �' �"� '�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> C� <br /> L�kES�I�4� NO. � -`�� �� ;�') <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1C, One Family Lakeshore Zoning <br /> District which requires a minimum lot area of 0.� acre and a miniinum lot <br /> width of 100'. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearin�� <br /> held on July 13, 2005 and on a vote of 6 — 1 recorninended approval of <br /> variances based on the follo�vin� findings: <br /> a. The applicant's property has 1?,726 s.f. or 0.29 acre in area and 100' <br /> of width at the north shoreline and �6' of width at the northern 75' <br /> setback. <br /> b. No additional land is available for acquisition by the applicant to malce <br /> the property conforming in area or width. <br /> c. The applicant is proposing to remove an ezisting detached gara�e and <br /> construct a slightly smaller attached garage with living space above; <br /> no additional living space is proposed within the substandard setbacks. <br /> d. Due to the hardcover levels and location of the home any additions or <br /> alterations to the house and detached garage require variances, <br /> e. There is no available land to purchase to make the property <br /> COnformina. <br /> f. The applicant is proposing to remove portions of nonconforming <br /> hardcover in conjunction with setbacl: variance approvals. <br /> g, The applicant is propo�inQ to reor?ent the existina driveway on site to <br /> allow for parl:ing on the property rather than on the nei�hborinb <br /> propert}� and ��;�ithin the easement. The existin� la}'out of the site, and <br /> the existing easement providina driveway access to the neighborinc <br /> properties, are hardships that support the proposed variances. <br /> �-{. ii12 Liiv �OLiIlCii 11nS COi1S1Ci2I2Ci tiii� dj��I1Cd11CI: :P.Cludin� t}:P f1I1�lI1�S <br /> and recommendation of the Plannina �orrunission, reports by City staff, <br /> comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health; safetv and welfare of the community. <br /> P�ge ? of 5 <br />