My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-17-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
05-17-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2021 8:48:52 AM
Creation date
5/18/2021 8:35:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
property or immediately adjoining property. <br /> aResponse: Substandard lot size would be afforded the 30% lot allotment had the original builder <br /> applied for the variance which is the commonly approved variance for lots like this. <br /> 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br /> said land is located. <br /> Response: Substandard lot size would be afforded the 30% lot allotment had the original builder <br /> applied for the variance which is the commonly approved variance for lots like this. <br /> 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br /> substantial property right of the applicant. <br /> Response: Approving the variant application will allow the homeowners to increase their deck size <br /> from a smaller deck size to one that will accommodate their growing family as they are expecting a <br /> child to be born in the next month or two. <br /> 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, <br /> comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. <br /> Response: Approving the variance application will not impede or impair anything related to the <br /> zoning code. <br /> 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant <br /> ibut is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. <br /> Response: The current deck size is not large enough to allow for a reasonable enjoyment or use of <br /> the homeowners growing family. Substandard lot size would be afforded the 30% lot allotment had <br /> the original builder applied for the variance which is the commonly approved variance for lots like this. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.