Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,February 8,2021 <br /> 6:03 p.m. <br /> 19. LA20-000048-TIMOTHY WHITTEN OB/O I.JACOBS/A.JACOBS REVOCABLE <br /> TRUST, 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE,PRELIMINARY PLAT-RESOLUTION—Continued <br /> Crosby asked if that would be item G. <br /> Walsh stated they could make it part of G:the evergreen buffering for the caretaker. <br /> Barnhart noted Walsh had also suggested an easement related for pedestrians to get to Lot A. <br /> Walsh said basically an easement along A,B, and C for walking. <br /> Crosby said it sounds like that would be G and H. <br /> Crosby moved to approve preliminary plat with all the conditions A-F as shown,and adding G, <br /> evergreen trees giving coverage to the caretaker's property to the east,and adding H which would <br /> be an easement buffer along the shoreline so people can travel between the parcels. <br /> Mattick asked to make a clarifying point. He thinks Crosby's motion was to approve the plat; what Staff <br /> is looking for,because the resolution is not drafted the motion is to direct Staff to prepare a resolution <br /> approving it with those conditions. <br /> Walsh said"so said." <br /> Crosby said yes,and thanked Mattick. <br /> Crosby offered a substitute motion to direct Staff to prepare a resolution to approve the <br /> preliminary plat application with Staff conditions and the added conditions G(evergreen buffering) <br /> and H(easement for pedestrians). <br /> Johnson asked if this is the right time to add the condition that there will be no communal dock there for <br /> non-riparian properties. <br /> Walsh thinks this is the appropriate time to put that, it would be condition I. <br /> Johnson said with respect to J,does the City Council have to hammer home any more regarding the turn <br /> lane and what options are available. <br /> Mattick said they will be back here in two weeks and they can contact Hennepin County and tell them the <br /> City Council is interested in a center turn lane and an acceleration lane and ask if that is on the table as <br /> something they would require. He said they would get as candid of feedback from them as they can. <br /> Walsh does not know that they put that as a condition but they would put it as a sidebar that they would <br /> also like to get feedback from the County. <br /> Mattick said they would direct Staff to try and facilitate that. <br /> Crosby said that is good. <br /> Page 24 of 26 <br />