Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,February 8,2021 <br /> 6:03 p.m. <br /> 19. LA20-000048-TIMOTHY WHITTEN O/B/O I.JACOBS/A.JACOBS REVOCABLE <br /> TRUST, 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE,PRELIMINARY PLAT-RESOLUTION—Continued <br /> Crosby continued saying that is not what the Council is up here for,although he wishes that they could. <br /> Then everybody who is a builder would be pissed off and the homeowners would love it. <br /> Johnson thinks what they have satisfied so far is that the 5 lots they are proposing meet code and that is it. <br /> So the question just becomes,what is a reasonable condition to put on the egress and ingress. <br /> Walsh said they cannot make Hennepin County do anything,which is part of the City's problem because <br /> it is not the City's road. The County has already said the only requirement from them is the turn lane. <br /> Crosby stated the City Council can say the Applicant must have the west bound turn lane in. <br /> In Mattick's opinion,yes. <br /> Walsh said yes, because that is something the County has recommended, so the condition is following <br /> that recommendation. In looking at the Staff recommendation with all the things,the resolution approval <br /> has all the following conditions A,B,C,D,E,and F. All City Engineering comments addressed to their <br /> satisfaction, on Exhibit F,get the Watershed District approval,Hennepin County approval of the road <br /> access and the intersection. All the City Staff comments on Exhibit H and the combination of all the lots <br /> when they do combine them and that would have to be followed through. Then there are the tree areas <br /> that they showed on Exhibit E with the 30 foot widths on the east and the west. He said it's got all that <br /> stuff,it has everything so far with all the little strings that tie it up to be sure that it follows all the <br /> protocols. Walsh said they want to get more than what they've already got from Hennepin County just to <br /> make sure that this is not something that is either required or that they would even consider;let alone if <br /> there is even room to do it. That gives two weeks before the resolution on February 22,2021. <br /> Crosby asked to put the plat on-screen. He asked where the caretaker property on the Burwell property is <br /> in relation right now. <br /> Barnhart noted on the screen that there is a house here, and there are some other structures. <br /> Crosby asked if there are tree buffers to that property also. <br /> Barnhart stated some tree buffers on-screen,but not immediately adjacent to the caretaker property. The <br /> Applicant has suggested tree planting. <br /> Crosby said there would be trees going in there. <br /> Barnhart said it is proposed and would be an appropriate condition to add. <br /> Walsh noted they talked about some kind of green,evergreen kind of screening. <br /> Crosby asked if that is part of these. <br /> Barnhart said not specifically,no. <br /> Page 23 of 26 <br />