02-16-2021 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

3. Intersection will require a Street name sign conforming to the city standards. Storm 1. Sheet 5 depicts and emergency overflow route into the public ROW. Storm water should not be directed onto the public ROW. Utilities 1. Standard city utility detail sheets should be included in the final plan set. 2. All non-metallic pipe will require tracer wire 3. Final plans will need to have the profile view for sewer, water and storm sewer. Additional comments received related to engineering will be forwarded. 6. The fire chief recommends that the fire hydrant proposed for the east side of road A, at its intersection with Kelley Parkway,be shifted to the other side of road A. 7. RPUD development standards. The numbered items refer to the corresponding standard found in Section 78-626. Items in bold reflect requested changes or information. 1. Minimum area. As noted previously,while the area of this project does not meet the minimum standard, however combining with the Stonebay character would allow the zoning. 2. Uses. The proposed attached family dwelling units are a permitted use. 3. Sewer Availability. The project complies as it is proposed to connect to sanitary sewer. 4. Density. The 37 units on 3.69 acres equates to 10 units per acre, consistent with the proposed Urban Medium High residential land use. 5. Incentives.No financial incentives are requested or proposed. 6. Floor Area Ratio. Please prepare an exhibit that shows a FAR anticipated for the lots. 7. a. Setbacks b. Height. The proposed two story buildings are not expected to approach the 30 feet limit. I note that no waiver from the height limit is requested. c. Outside storage. A covenant will need to be provided that prohibits outdoor storage. 11. Private Recreational area. I note sheet 4 shows the 0.71 acre open space. 12. Single Ownership. Homeowners association documents will need to be prepared to management maintenance of the grounds, roads, play area,and other common features. 13. Signage. I note the plans show two monument signs. Please provide a detail of these signs. 14. Landscaping. The landscaping plan appears to meet the code requirements in terms of number of plants. The planting legend does not include plants labeled as WN. Please advise. Staff recommends an alternative to Arborvitae along the southern property line. (Another reason to reconfigure these homes). I note the comment about adding fencing along the south wall of the retaining all at the SW corner, the retaining wall in this area is 4 feet. 15. Architectural standards. Please provide further detail on the proposed homes, building materials, height, color palette. 16. Flexibility. The RPUD standards allow for flexibility from city standards, but it is important to understand where flexibility is requested.