My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
02-16-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2021 3:57:08 PM
Creation date
2/17/2021 2:01:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 8 <br /> January 20, 2021 <br /> 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- <br /> family dwelling." <br /> Not applicable to this application. <br /> 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or <br /> immediately adjoining property." <br /> a. Non-Conforming: The property is non-conforming lot under the RI-A district Lot area <br /> requirements. The property is .53 acres vs the required 1.0 acres. The lot width at the <br /> front setback line is 127.95 vs the required 140 ft. <br /> The R1-A district front(35 ft), side (10 ft) and back yard (30 ft) setbacks are currently <br /> conforming. However, the setbacks are all over proportioned to the actual lot area by <br /> almost double relative to a conforming lot area requirement of 1.0 acre. If the setbacks <br /> were proportional to actual lot size, they would be 18.55 ft(front), 5.3 ft (side) and 15.9 ft <br /> (rear) <br /> b. Excessive Structure Setback: The home was built 69.5 ft from the front property line. It <br /> exceeds the minimum 35 ft front yard setback by an additional 34.5 ft. This significantly <br /> reduces the usable rear yard depth by 34.5 ft, an area greater than 5,000+ sq ft. <br /> c. Structure Layout and Placement: The property is a wedge shape with the front property <br /> line 107.73 ft and the rear property line 208.42 ft. The home was not built aligned with <br /> nor perpendicular to any property boundary AND the garage was located on the side of <br /> the home with the longest side property line. The result is the nonliving portion of the <br /> home (i.e. the garage) has substantially more rear yard depth and area than that on the <br /> living side. <br /> 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is <br /> located." <br /> Other homes in the district may have one or two similar peculiarities included above, no home has <br /> all three aspects. <br /> 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant." <br /> A customary and normally sized screen porch with views of their rear yard is a substantial <br /> property right for a nonconforming 'A+ dry acre parcel. <br /> 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort,morals, or in <br /> any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." <br /> A screen porch is in no manner contrary to the intent of the zoning code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.