Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 8 <br /> January 20, 2021 <br /> The addition of a screen porch will not change the essential character of the neighborhood. <br /> As designed and located, the addition creates the least impact to other property owners' lines of <br /> sight. <br /> a. The adjacent property owner to the west has a double car garage near the shared <br /> property line.The property owner's home angles toward the west away from the subject <br /> property. These two aspects of the west property together with the subject property <br /> garage location effectively blocks the west neighbor's interior and exterior sight lines of <br /> the addition. <br /> b. The adjacent property owner to the north is the Wayzata Country Club (WCC). A 135 ft <br /> deep tree grove mostly on the WWC property creates a significant green screen barrier <br /> to the addition. Furthermore,the screen porch finished floor elevation is 978.27. The <br /> elevation at the back-property line is 983.0 and 990 before emerging on to WCC's golf <br /> cart path on the other side of tree grove. Therefore,the screen porch finished floor <br /> elevation as proposed will be 11.4 feet below the cart path elevation. <br /> c. The adjacent property owner to the east has a double car garage near the shared <br /> property line. The east property owner's home angles toward the east away from the <br /> subject property. These two aspects of the east property together with the subject <br /> property's tree grove, and elevation change of 7 feet functionally blocks the east <br /> neighbor's interior and exterior sign lines of the addition. <br /> d. The single-family home#128 located to the south across Chevy Chase Drive from the <br /> subject property does not have any interior window or yard sight lines of the addition. <br /> e. The undeveloped lot#132 located to the southeast across from the subject property is <br /> owned by the City of Orono as such is not negatively impacted. <br /> 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property <br /> exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." <br /> It is possible but not economically feasible to: <br /> a. move the entire home 12.2' toward the front setback line, or <br /> b. change the angle of the home on the lot to permit the required back yard setback, or <br /> c. change the side of the home on which the garage is placed. <br /> 5. "Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy <br /> systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota §216C.06, <br /> subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter." <br /> Not applicable to this application. <br /> 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not <br /> allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." <br /> The Nelson's use of the property as a single-family home is consistent with R1-A permitted uses. <br />