My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-27-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
11-27-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 1:47:37 PM
Creation date
7/15/2015 4:15:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. <br /> Date Applic�tion Received: 08-23-OG �OUNCIL MEETING <br /> Date Application Considered �s Com�lete: 08-23-06 <br /> 60-D1y Review Period Expires(Extension): 12-23-06 ��V 2 � 2��6 <br /> REQU�ST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CIn oF ORONO <br /> Date: November 22, 2006 <br /> Item No. (p <br /> Department Approval: Administr�tor Approvnl: Agenda Section: <br /> Name: Melanie Curtis ��r f <br /> Title: City Plaiuier U <br /> Item Description: <br /> #06-3233 —Fritz Wright on behalf of Episcopal Diocese of Minnesota (St. Edward's Church), 865 <br /> North Ferndale Rd, Conditional Use Permit, Public Hearing <br /> Zoning District: RR— 1B, One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) <br /> Lot Area: 189,182 s.£ (4.34 acres) <br /> Lot Width: 331 feet <br /> List of Exhibits: <br /> Exhibzt A - Resolution Per Cotulcil Decision <br /> Exhibit B - Council Packet of November 8, 2006 <br /> Exhibit C - Minutes fi•om Novenzber 13, 2006 <br /> Application Summary: <br /> This application was approved by the Council at the November 13t�'meeting. <br /> Planning Commission Recommendation <br /> On September 18, Planning Commission voted 3- 2 to recommend approval of the conditional use <br /> permit for site grading and sign square footage variance, but not the sign height variance. The <br /> dissenting Conunissioners were supportive of the application, but voted against the motion because <br /> they were supportive of the applicant's request for a 6" height variance for the proposed monument <br /> sign. <br /> Planning Staff Recommendation <br /> Review and approve the attached Resolution. <br /> COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST�D <br /> Approve or amend the attached Resolution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.