Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 23, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 7 <br /> <br />CONSENT AGENDA – Continued <br /> <br />Crosby moved, Johnson seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as revised, with Items No. 4, 5, <br />11, and 13 removed. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> <br />There were no public comments. <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY REPORT <br /> <br />16. SECOND AMENDMENT DEDICATED CITY <br /> <br />Mattick stated this is an item the Council discussed at their previous meeting and at the study session earlier <br />this evening. He explained that the resolution for Council consideration expresses support for the second <br />amendment in its fullest sense and supports the rights conferred by the second amendment. <br /> <br />Walsh noted there was a member of the public that was here to comment on this item and asked them to <br />come to the podium and state their name and address for the record. <br /> <br />Brad Evans, 6041 Hermitage Trail, Minnestrista, thanked the Council for considering adoption of this <br />resolution because, in this day and age, it takes a lot of guts to do something like this. He stated that they <br />are law abiding citizens and as a member of the Minnetonka Sportsmen’s Club, he wanted to let the Council <br />know that they appreciate and respect what this Council is doing with this resolution. <br /> <br />Crosby read aloud the resolution language. <br /> <br />Crosby moved, Johnson seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 7140, a Resolution Declaring <br />Orono a Second Amendment Dedicated City. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />Walsh noted, as suggested by Councilmember Printup, every month the Council pulls up an item under the <br />Bill of Rights, talks about it a little bit, and has a Resolution in support of each item. <br /> <br />2019 TRANSFER – PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT (formerly Consent Agenda item #4) <br /> <br />Walsh stated that he is assuming the overage is what was planned for the roads budget for 2020 and asked <br />if he was mistaken and it was actually for the roads budget for 2021. <br /> <br />Edwards stated that the overage would be for the 2021 roads budget. <br /> <br />Walsh stated that would mean the City is already starting out with $717,000 and then has about $125,000 <br />with the cell tower revenue and about $641,000 in the pavement management levy. <br /> <br />Rief noted there was $717,000 in the pavement management levy. <br /> <br />Ung clarified that this is for the roads budget for 2020 and not 2021. <br />