Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 28, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 7 of 9 <br /> <br />$250,000 home it would increase $7.27. Olson noted it would be a 1.87% increase in taxes with the <br />additional levy, and even if they went with that additional levy the tax capacity is back where the City <br />was in 2017, which would still be a significant decrease from 2014. He stated keeping the rate flat for <br />four years is something to be proud of. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh added they should also be proud of paying off millions of dollars in debt and bringing the <br />road pavement levies up at the same time. He noted on the slide onscreen, he asked Olson to use 2014 <br />(his first year on the Council), 2017 (his first year as Mayor), and he wants people to understand in 2014 <br />if they owned a $300,000 house, they were paying $534 in taxes to Orono, and in 2021 if they choose <br />option B, they would only be paying $504. In essentially 7 years on the same value home, homeowners <br />are paying less in City taxes. He noted the Council has lowered taxes, payed off $7 million in debt since <br />2014, taken the pavement management levy from $0 to $750,000, is starting the parks budget at $50,000 <br />and is starting/supplementing the building fund as well as lowering everyone’s taxes. He said what <br />people see in the paper, which can be a bit misleading, is that this might be an 8% increase in the general <br />levy, but it’s less than 2% of their taxes going up. From 7 years ago, it’s still 5% less or more. <br /> <br />Seals said she feels the City Council can do a better job of communicating this to the public, because she <br />understands when people receive their property tax bill it has gone up, but they’re not just looking at the <br />City portion, they’re looking at the County and the Total, which will change. On a good note, their home <br />values most likely went up, but they may not be isolating the portion where they’re actually being charged <br />less per their dollar. Seals stated they have multiple avenues to communicate and give the facts over and <br />over. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh noted in his newsletter column, he points out often that they’re paying off millions of <br />dollars and have not taken on any additional debt, while increasing fund balances to take care of the City. <br />He reported past administrations have said they didn’t raise the levy at all…but they borrowed $2 million <br />dollars and then they’d borrow another $1 million dollars and just kept adding up the debt load. <br /> <br />Crosby said they really need to strongly identify the other pieces of the pie, i.e. Hennepin County and <br />perhaps including graphs going back in time to see where the County has gone percentage-wise, noting <br />he’d hate to see what happened in Minneapolis… <br /> <br />Printup said one thing they’ve talked about are the utility bill postcards that go out and he wonders if <br />there is something else, they can use rather than the same redundant postcard. He thinks they could <br />explore what other cities do, and look at a full-size mailer with lots of information, including the graphs, <br />the information on the debt and a look behind the scenes. <br /> <br />Seals noted they could do a fact of the month, something super clear that catches people’s attention, but <br />over time gets the message out. <br /> <br />Crosby said it would be educating the public and giving them the facts. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh said people should know the success that their City is having. <br /> <br />Printup said part of the reason he is comfortable with the levy is that they don’t know what next year is <br />going to hold, noting Hennepin County is identifying a 0% levy and they don’t usually do that…he asked <br />what does that mean a year from now; what will they do? <br />