My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 12:32:10 PM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:34:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 28, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 6 of 9 <br /> <br />Olson said that would be any of the cities surrounding Orono, some of them are in the 70% range for <br />property taxes. <br /> <br />Crosby said the comparison to other cities might be something to put in the newsletter to show the public <br />that Orono is holding their Tax Levy down. <br /> <br />Seals noted they’ve hesitated to do that in the past, and her Dad showed her what he gets from Edina and <br />they have no problem putting it out there; she reported Orono was the lowest, so she thinks they shouldn’t <br />be afraid to, because the numbers are a data point. <br /> <br />Crosby said they do strive to keep taxes down. <br /> <br />Johnson said Orono is 53% of their budget at a reduced percentage compared to neighboring cities, on top <br />of that. <br /> <br />Olson noted some of those other cities receive State aid and Orono does not, other than for Police State <br />aid. He summarized the expenditure budget by department, pointing out the Police budget only increased <br />$16,000, which is only approximately one-third of a percent. He stated he wants to give Chief Farniok <br />credit for keeping his budget under control and noted he’s worked for some cities where Police Chiefs <br />were very egotistical and just want to see their budget increase and increase. He said Orono does not <br />have a Chief like that. He continued saying street maintenance is budgeted to increase $32,000 (with <br />wages and benefits driving most of the increase); Parks wage, step increases and the new position split <br />between janitorial and parks are $49,000; Golf course is $13,200, noting in the 2020 budget they didn’t <br />have part-time wages, and this is just making the budget match the reality of what is happening. <br /> <br />Crosby asked if the Council got a raise. <br /> <br />Seals replied no, but you do occasionally get a sandwich. <br /> <br />Crosby asked why the Mayor/Council budget is up and has increased. <br /> <br />Rief believes it was related to one of their memberships. <br /> <br />Olson continued in talking about governmental services and wages, and that wages are basically the <br />budget as there is very little discretionary spending that doesn’t involve personal services and especially <br />when adding in the $1.5 million in professional services. He noted $7.45 million of a $9.2 million budget <br />has to do with whether people are employees of the City or services that are contracted out. He likes to <br />point that out because two departments have money that isn’t wages (streets as they have street supplies; <br />and Police because of training, uniforms, etcetera). With many of the other departments it’s pretty much <br />employees and some training. Olson continued the presentation saying if they look at the school, County <br />and City portions of property tax bills, normally it’s right around 27-29% and they’re all pretty equal. <br />Looking at the City’s portion in Orono, it’s only 15% of the property tax bill. Olson noted there are two <br />resolutions tonight. The first increases the tax levy to $6.485 million which would keep the tax rate pretty <br />much equal (decreasing it by .009%). The second resolution has an additional $125,000 in the levy, <br />16.512% to 16.821% (increasing it by .3%). Olson explained what that means for a home; if they go up <br />to $6.485 million, and the levy is at 16.503%, people would actually see a slight decrease in their City <br />property tax, assuming that their property value did not change. The second resolution is $6.6 million and <br />on a $2 million home, that would increase someone’s City portion of property taxes by $73.00; on a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.