My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 12:32:10 PM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:34:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />August 26, 2020 <br /> <br />Alliant Engineering <br />Attn: Mark Rausch VIA EMAIL <br />733 Marquette Ave. Suite 700 mrausch@alliant-inc.com <br />Minneapolis, MN 55402 <br /> <br />Re: Orono Crossings sketch <br /> File # LA20-000052 <br /> <br />Mr. Rausch, <br />The City has received and completed its’ preliminary review of your proposed Orono Crossing subdivision, <br />consisting of 43 single family units in 12 townhome buildings. <br /> <br />Your application is scheduled to be reviewed by the Planning Commission on Monday, September 21. The meeting <br />starts at 6:00 pm. An agenda and staff report will be emailed to you on or about Friday, September 18th. <br /> <br />At this time, I have the following comments to offer. These comments may echo some of the comments raised in <br />May during a review of a preliminary draft. <br /> <br />Additional approvals. <br />1. I anticipate this project being developed as a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). The RPUD <br />standards include specific guidance on landscaping/ screening, building materials/ finishes. This project <br />will require a zone change. <br />2. As a RPUD, the Council reviews the project in two formal steps: concept plan review, and Master <br />Development plan. The concept plan should include the following additional information: <br /> Height of all buildings and square footage of buildings anticipated. <br />3. 43 units in 3.69 acres = 11.65 units per acre. The project as proposed will require a Comprehensive <br />Plan Amendment because the proposed density is lower that as guided by the Comprehensive Plan. <br />General comments. <br />4. RPUD zoning requires 10% of the gross land area to be used for private recreational. I see that a tot lot <br />is proposed. Are other amenities anticipated? <br />5. The RPUD requires certain setbacks for multifamily attached structures: <br />a. Collector street, 50 feet, <br />b. All other property lines, 30 feet. I think the intent of this is setbacks from external streets, not the <br />internal setbacks. <br />6. The RPUD requirements include specific landscaping standards. I have attached these for you.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.