Laserfiche WebLink
planning meeting. We have mature trees and arbs that screen the property on both sides. Even <br />without the shrubs, does not impact neighbors views. <br /> <br /> <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for <br />an addition to an existing single family home in a residential zone is consistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br /> <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br /> <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted <br />by the official controls; The request to build a home addition within the street yard setback, <br />average lakeshore setback, new hardcover in the 75’ lakeyard and not meeting driveway <br />standards does not appear to be reasonable as the current home has adequate use of the lot. <br /> <br />Response: This is consistent use with neighborhood lots who have been granted similar <br />variances. The commission appears to be acting arbitrarily with respect to our plans given that <br />not a single other property in our neighborhood conforms to the stated standards. <br /> <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The <br />owner’s desire to enclose the existing garage to make more living space and then add a new <br />garage within the street yard and average lakeshore setback to the home is a condition created by <br />the landowner and <br /> <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The setback variances <br />from the street yard and average lakeshore setback resulting from a building addition may <br />adversely alter the character of the area. The variances for the driveway dimensions and new <br />driveway hardcover in the 75’ lake yard may limit the parking ability for the homeowner and <br />may adversely impact the character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Response: The proposed design softens the vertical nature of our home. It increases the curb <br />appeal and character of the home that is consistent with the neighborhood, see 1973 Fagerness. <br />All neighbors agree that the new design provides depth and softens the vertical nature of the <br />property. Not permitting the proposed construction actually hurts both the neighborhood and the <br />value of our home; as the home would be substantially different and less desirable than the other <br />homes in the neighborhood. <br /> <br />As to parking, the current garage/storage limits the inside parking spaces which creates the <br />requirement of parking in driveway, and across road parking spot, and is especially difficult for <br />guests in the winter months. With the addition, we will be able to park our two cars inside the <br />garage (currently only one fits), while still accommodating 5 guests in the driveway and parking <br />spot, which is more parking than any neighbor. <br /> <br />