My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 12:32:10 PM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:34:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
access to a public or private road. The applicant is proposing an 18’ wide driveway within the <br />75’ lakeyard where only an 8’ wide driveway is permitted. <br /> <br />Response: See schedule C. We measured all driveways on Fagerness Point Road, starting at <br />1973 Fagerness. The average driveway width was 18’+. So there is neighborhood precedent for <br />this variance. <br /> <br />Driveway Width: <br /> <br />1987 Fagerness: 33’ Driveway -- 19’ Garage Concrete and 14’ Driveway Asphalt. 33’ total. <br />1981 Fagerness: 20’ Driveway Asphalt <br />1975 Fagerness: 18’ Garage Concrete <br />1971 Fagerness: 20’ Driveway Gravel <br />1973 Fagerness: 20’ Driveway Concrete <br /> <br />Solution: We proposed 18’, which is the average on Fagerness Point. <br /> <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the <br />Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety <br />and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of <br />fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The <br />Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal <br />provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical <br />difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and <br />shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with <br />the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute <br />practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to <br />direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered <br />construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. <br />The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this <br />chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council <br />may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br /> <br />According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br /> <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />requested rear yard setback, average lakeshore setbacks, driveway standard and hardcover within <br />the 75’ of the lakeyard are not in harmony with the Ordinances as the proposed addition would <br />limit the lake sightline for neighbors and create addition massing close to the right of way. The <br />number of variances requests suggest that the site does not support the proposal. <br /> <br />Response: Our proposed design is consistent with the neighborhood and virtually identical to the <br />new construction at 1973 Fagerness. There is no impact of line of site for either neighbor. Our <br />immediate neighbor, Ms. Hartung, wrote a letter of recommendation supporting our proposed <br />project. We understand that the Millers are in support of it as well and will be attending the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.