Laserfiche WebLink
access to a public or private road. The applicant is proposing an 18’ wide driveway within the <br />75’ lakeyard where only an 8’ wide driveway is permitted. <br /> <br />Response: See schedule C. We measured all driveways on Fagerness Point Road, starting at <br />1973 Fagerness. The average driveway width was 18’+. So there is neighborhood precedent for <br />this variance. <br /> <br />Driveway Width: <br /> <br />1987 Fagerness: 33’ Driveway -- 19’ Garage Concrete and 14’ Driveway Asphalt. 33’ total. <br />1981 Fagerness: 20’ Driveway Asphalt <br />1975 Fagerness: 18’ Garage Concrete <br />1971 Fagerness: 20’ Driveway Gravel <br />1973 Fagerness: 20’ Driveway Concrete <br /> <br />Solution: We proposed 18’, which is the average on Fagerness Point. <br /> <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the <br />Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety <br />and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of <br />fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The <br />Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal <br />provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical <br />difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and <br />shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with <br />the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute <br />practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to <br />direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered <br />construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. <br />The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this <br />chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council <br />may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br /> <br />According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br /> <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />requested rear yard setback, average lakeshore setbacks, driveway standard and hardcover within <br />the 75’ of the lakeyard are not in harmony with the Ordinances as the proposed addition would <br />limit the lake sightline for neighbors and create addition massing close to the right of way. The <br />number of variances requests suggest that the site does not support the proposal. <br /> <br />Response: Our proposed design is consistent with the neighborhood and virtually identical to the <br />new construction at 1973 Fagerness. There is no impact of line of site for either neighbor. Our <br />immediate neighbor, Ms. Hartung, wrote a letter of recommendation supporting our proposed <br />project. We understand that the Millers are in support of it as well and will be attending the