Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 21, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Minnehaha Watershed District came out to look at the property. He noted the creek is not on this <br />property. <br />Chair Ressler clarified that whenever there is a situation, the Watershed must weigh in on whether there <br />are wetlands on the property. <br />Ms. Curtis said the Watershed District has reviewed the wetland delineation that says no wetlands are <br />present and that is the official record; it doesn’t mean there isn’t drainage across the property or seasonal <br />water, but it isn’t a wetland. She noted it’s in the property owner’s best interest to make sure the water <br />that comes to the property moves off the property in the way it has been and the engineer has reviewed <br />the grading plan and approved it. <br />Chair Ressler noted the final grading would verify the proposed grading that has been approved by the <br />engineer is met. <br />Ms. Curtis said the As-Built Survey would confirm that. <br />Mr. Dropps said they will keep the erosion control in place until turf is established. <br />Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 8:10 p.m. <br />Gettman said regarding the question of whether or not it’s wetlands, it’s the runoff, and could potentially <br />have a negative impact with the runoff. The bigger issue he has in looking at the Practical Difficulties is <br />whether or not this is a Taking, as the property is not conducive to be built upon, there are many issues <br />and variances to be able to build on the property. This begs the question if it’s not buildable, then it’s a <br />Taking, and the City would actually buy it. He understands that the property owner wants to build on it <br />and enjoy it, and he appreciates that, however it is a horrible location for what has been built around it and <br />are causing the Difficulties they’re trying to deal with. He doesn’t have a magic solution and that is what <br />he’s struggling with. As Ms. Johnson noted, there are accidents across County Road (CR) 19, accidents <br />as they’re coming down CR 19, and the new people in the Lakeview Development who will fly by the <br />area as they’re rushing up the hill to turn right onto CR 19. Gettman said it’s a very difficult corner to <br />deal with. He believes everyone should have a right to build on their property with whatever variances <br />that can be accommodated to enjoy that property, and this one he struggles with because of the location as <br />its been left for 35 and many things have happened around the property that has made it very difficult to <br />build on without adverse effects. <br />Ms. Forcier’s husband Jeff Anderson said in talking about the issue of traffic, if they don’t build, what is <br />the City going to do about it. If it’s an issue, it should be addressed but it doesn’t have anything to do <br />with the lot and the runoff is off the property and it’s not affected by anything on the property. <br />Gettman said that is his struggle, the runoff literally goes right under the road which is where the <br />driveway would be. With respect to the traffic, Mr. Anderson is absolutely right, that traffic isn’t going <br />away whether or not they build, but it will be exacerbated and made potentially worse if someone stops in <br />front of their house, someone will have to pull around and that will be a head-on collision when someone <br />is turning left to go onto North Arm. <br />Mr. Anderson said they would have to do that even if the house wasn’t there.