My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 12:32:10 PM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:34:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 21, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson noted the lot has received zero maintenance for 35 years by the landowner and now they’re <br />going to have a 50-day maintenance system on it. According to the City’s Comprehensive Plan and City <br />Zoning, its deemed unbuildable unless it meets the planning requirements, and asked if one of the unique <br />requirements will be that is has a specialized septic system. <br />Ms. Curtis replied it is required to have sewage treatment, yes. <br />Ms. Johnson asked if the Minnehaha Watershed has reviewed the analysis. <br />Ms. Curtis isn’t entirely sure what Ms. Johnson is asking but noted the Watershed District were required <br />to do a wetland delineation, which showed there was no wetland on the property. There will be drainage <br />over the property, as everyone’s home has drainage across the lot. The Applicant will be required to <br />maintain the drainage and are showing they will do so with the grading plan. <br />Ms. Johnson noted it is a very small piece of land and they want to make sure all of the requirements have <br />been reviewed. She said in part, trust has been lost because the site was demolished before grading <br />permitting had been approved and there is concern that the City has been able to take the time and <br />necessary precautions to make sure it won’t have a negative impact on the surrounding areas. Going back <br />to the safety issues, she asked how building on that corner will impact visibility on County Road 19, <br />which has very high traffic density, and even having a garbage truck at that point could potentially be a <br />detriment to traffic. She asked if the Commissioners are familiar with the corner. <br />The Commissioners replied yes, they are very familiar with it. <br />Gettman said his concern is someone coming at 50 miles per hour over the hill and down County Road 19 <br />is then blind to that garbage truck, or someone will try to go around them, and it will be a head-on. He <br />understands completely, but it all goes back to the money the homeowner’s association/group that was <br />against the Lakeview Development spent on lawyers, and asked if there’s been any discussion on buying <br />that property. <br />Ms. Johnson said there are other individuals more suited to speak on behalf of the Lakeview Organization <br />than she is, but once they saw the land was being cleared and that building was teeing up, through <br />discovery, she learned that the Lakeview Legacy Park had approached the last Mayor and City Planning <br />group to see if the City would be willing to sell them the land so it could be attached to Legacy Park and <br />restore the original Orono one-room schoolhouse. She noted they didn’t realize it would be built again <br />and they haven’t had a chance to mobilize an offer. She reiterated the visibility, safety and the watershed <br />(if impeded, significant flooding will occur on the land behind it, which is Ms. Johnson’s property). Ms. <br />Johnson said when the land was clear-cut, the owners chipped all of the trees and used it to fill in ravines <br />around the corner before any watershed had come out, so again trust has been broken and concerns are in <br />place because normal process and procedure hasn’t been respected. <br />Ms. Curtis said she believes the oversight in the demolition permit was that it was a foundation; she <br />doesn’t think they were aware they needed a demolition permit for the pieces of the foundation that were <br />there. She doesn’t believe they were trying to subvert any City regulations. <br />Bud Dropps, owner of Accent Homes who will be the builder on the project, stated they have a <br />demolition permit and had permission to cut the trees down, there was a wetland delineation, the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.