Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Thursday, August 13, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 2 of 8  <br />  <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None <br /> <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> <br />14. LA19-000065 – CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO SUBDIVISIONS <br /> <br />Barnhart gave a review of draft changes to the Subdivision Code, noting it is a lot of information to <br />review so he is not asking for approval tonight, instead he would like to hear any comments or questions <br />the Council may have and he can come back with any changes or updates for a motion for approval at an <br />upcoming meeting. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated Staff was authorized over a year ago and has been working with the City Attorney over <br />the last 3-4 months with the goal to revise and clarify the ordinances that relate to Subdivision. He noted <br />that Councilmembers could see on their screens the comments that he, Attorney Mattick and the Planning <br />Commission made through their review, noting the Council felt that was helpful with a recent subdivision <br />to see how they worked through issues. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted they tried to make the Subdivision process consistent with State statute, as in some areas it <br />is not consistent, and also to make sure it matches City of Orono practices and policies. He said they <br />removed some things that are not needed in the Subdivision Code. He said the main change addressed <br />definitions, noting they wanted them to match the Zoning Code and there were 5-10 areas that did not <br />match between the Zoning Code and Subdivision Code and that is problematic for many reasons so this <br />was a good opportunity to make them match. In the current Subdivision Code there are three types of <br />Subdivisions, Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3. Barnhart is proposing to strike those and use just one <br />classification, as the process is basically the same (Planning Commission, Council, Public Hearings). The <br />different classifications caused some confusion for applicants and occasionally Staff, so they did away <br />with the three classifications to make it easier to understand the process. <br /> <br />Another change made is proposing that every subdivision, which is the creation of a new lot, rather than a <br />boundary line adjustment, would be platted instead of described by metes and bounds. While this may <br />have a little more up front expense, Barnhart thinks it will pay off in dividends down the line when the <br />property owner has to create an easement or adjust a boundary line, as they have a much easier legal <br />description to create and go back through metes and bounds history. <br /> <br />Finally, Barnhart noted they wanted to take a critical review of their subdivision process to make sure it <br />met with State statute. There are a number of changes in the draft, accompanied by notes explaining the <br />reasons why the changes were made to make things clearer for the Council. He said the Planning <br />Commission reviewed the process over the last two months, noting they tabled action as they had <br />questions and requested additional information. He pointed out that the Council has the June 15, 2020 <br />Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, noting the July Planning Commission Meeting Minutes came <br />late and he will get them to the Council. Ultimately, the Planning Commission recommended approval <br />on a 5-to-1 vote with Commissioner Chris Bollis voting against the changes as he had some questions or <br />concerns with several sections. <br /> <br />Barnhart reiterated he is not looking for approval tonight but would like some feedback and direction <br />from the Council.