My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
06-22-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 11:19:11 AM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:16:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 18, 2020 <br />6:00 p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />6. LA20-000003 JOHN NEWELL, 1485 6TH AVENUE NORTH, SKETCH PLAN, 8:01 P.M. – <br />8:32 P.M. <br /> <br />John Newell, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Staff presented a summary of packet information. <br /> <br />Ressler asked for clarification of the conservation design requirement and why the Commission would <br />discuss a waiver in lieu of identifying substantial trees. <br /> <br />Oakden stated that she believes it is relatively common on smaller plats like this where only 3 lots are <br />created to identify substantial trees, which are over 6 inches in diameter rather than going through an <br />entire conservation design process. <br /> <br />Ressler ask if this is a cost savings as well as an efficiency. <br /> <br />Oakden stated that was correct. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if the City had any regulations that will allow it to protect the trees once they are identified. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated that what the City looks at with the conservation design requirement includes more than <br />just the trees, such as slopes. He stated that while there isn’t anything in the Code, he gave the example <br />of a stand of significant oaks. He explained that the City could say to the developer that this is an <br />important feature of the lot and should be protected, so the City may not approve a plan that shows a road <br />cutting directly through that area. He gave another example of the conservation design identifying the <br />mature oak in Basswood Forest. He explained that the conservation design is used to help guide the <br />developer in areas that the City is trying to protect from a character standpoint. <br /> <br />Ressler asked if the City had reviewed the proposed well and septic plans. <br /> <br />Oakden stated that she thinks the applicant has just recently coordinated their septic testing, so she does <br />not think the City has reviewed this yet. She noted that the applicant has received feedback that they have <br />viable septic sites. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated that the City is not looking for a final report at this stage, until the City has determined the <br />layout is acceptable, but to just know that there are viable sites. He gave an overview of how the sketch <br />plan process works in this situation. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if there was sanitary sewer in this area around Highway 6. <br /> <br />Oakden stated that there isn’t and would connect over on Brown so the applicant would have to explore <br />through private lots in order to connect. <br /> <br />Erickson asked if that may be feasible for the southernmost location. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.