My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
06-22-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 11:19:11 AM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:16:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 8, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 15 of 21 <br /> <br />Seals asked what was problematic with Golden Valley as far as why it took them so long. <br /> <br />Johnson said Golden Valley did not get the cooperation from realtors when it got rolled out. <br /> <br />Walsh said Golden Valley did it so that when someone listed their property, it had to be done. <br /> <br />Johnson said the realtors fought the City; the City did not get any support in rolling out the idea. Since it <br />was 2007, it was probably a pretty aggressive idea at the time. Golden Valley does the vast majority of <br />the inspections, but they have a provision that vendors can get approved to do it. One of the things they <br />learned is, if there are outside vendors doing it, they had to specify what type of camera quality, because <br />some guy might have black-and-white photos. They had to come up with a process, if an outside vendor <br />was used, of what specifically they have to do. He said he called three people that do that inspection, and <br />none of them had the same camera. Two of them said they would not be responsible for sending the <br />video; another guy said he would put it on a thumb drive and give it to the resident and they can be <br />responsible for getting it to the City. Then the City would get thumb drives potentially. Golden Valley <br />also ran into a very clear definition of what’s acceptable, because when you do these, you find dips. Lots <br />of engineers will say a certain amount of dip is acceptable or is not acceptable. Also, they can’t do the <br />scoping because it needs to be cleaned first. He asked what provisions do they have when the scope won’t <br />go through because of all the roots that grow in there and make it so the scope does not work and a <br />cleaning has to be set up first. He said this is costing Orono hundreds of thousands of dollars from the <br />Met Council. <br /> <br />Walsh said if the City does it, it bypasses all the issues about specs from a different vendor, although it <br />puts more onus on the City. <br /> <br />Johnson said the issue with just the City doing it is really their capacity to respond within what is defined <br />as a reasonable timeline to get everything done. As he read through the structure, the City provides <br />timelines of when they have to get it corrected. Some of them are catastrophic, and they can’t be given 90 <br />days to fix a catastrophic failure such as a complete separation and there is a sinkhole of that household’s <br />waste going in the ground, or a line collapses. Statistically, what is being proposed does work. They saw a <br />huge reduction in their daily groundwater getting in, etc. Golden Valley started out with the City putting <br />lining in, just like Orono. It was Mr. Oliver’s opinion that the majority of the water getting in was coming <br />from the residential properties. He stated when Golden Valley would do roadwork, they would do every <br />sewer on there because there is an economy of scale when you are pounding them out and already doing <br />the roadwork. <br /> <br />Walsh noted those are not voluntary at that point because people are selling their house. The City is doing <br />road work and then they are going to do inspections. <br /> <br />Johnson said the City is proposing $250 and he wanted to make sure the City was not undercutting what <br />the private sector charges. <br /> <br />Walsh stated $250 was a pretty fair cost. He said it would be another discussion if the City were doing a <br />road and wanted to proactively start going in and doing that. The City has never done it before and can <br />baby step their way into it. He mentioned that it sounds like the program is set up relatively well at this <br />point. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.