Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, October 12, 2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 16. LA20-000057—MICHAEL GALLUS CONSTRUCTION, INC., 1985 FAGERNESS <br /> POINT ROAD, VARIANCES <br /> Matt Briggs, Applicant, was present. <br /> Staff presented a summary packet of information. The Planning Commission could not support <br /> the Application as proposed, however with amendments, which included removal of an <br /> encroachment into the average lakeshore setback, it might make for a stronger variance <br /> application. The Commission found that the practical difficulties were not met with a 5-0 vote to <br /> deny. Staff recommended denial for the original application of the 4 proposed variances and <br /> Council should review the amended plans, determine if practical difficulties are met and give <br /> direction to Staff for a resolution. <br /> Mayor Walsh stated he was at the Planning Commission meeting, and said the neighboring <br /> properties had existing grandfathered conditions and this application is a new property that was <br /> built. Essentially, the Applicant wants to back themselves in to old, grandfathered-in conditions. <br /> Ms. Oakden replied many of the homes on Fagerness are original and dealing with existing <br /> conditions. She noted the Applicant's home was built in 2009 and worked to meet all the City <br /> setback standards. Now with different scenarios and reasoning they are asking for this addition <br /> to their house. <br /> Johnson noted there was a corrected average lakeshore setback in the packet and asked if there is <br /> any dispute about that. <br /> Ms. Oakden said there was some clarification in the beginning of the submittal process but the <br /> survey that went to the Planning Commission and the survey in front of the Council have the <br /> corrected/accurate average lakeshore setback shown. She noted they reduced the addition by two <br /> feet and cut out a corner of the proposed addition to meet the average lakeshore setback line. <br /> Matt Briggs, 1985 Fagerness Point Road, gave background noting he built the home in 2009 and <br /> at that time the garage was within feet of Fagerness Point. They have always want to follow the <br /> rules and built the house accordingly; what is important to understand is that the neighborhood is <br /> designed and all home have garages within the setback. Mr. Briggs came to the Council <br /> meeting, listened to the review and it was all thoughtful and spent a lot of time going back and <br /> virtually eliminated 3 of the 4 variances down to a single variance that has to do with the road <br /> setback. Some improvements they have made to the property include the watershed and grading; <br /> he believes the design of the home is actually more consistent with the neighborhood with the <br /> current design of the house. Their house is very vertical and feels very tall and this addition <br /> would soften it up. They got the design idea from 1973 Fagerness Point Road, which was <br /> recently completed. He has done some research on practical difficulty and noted he is a business <br /> owner and everyday he deals with problems and finds solutions. The problem in this case was <br /> they had 4 variances and they have whittled it down to a single variance, which is a setback that <br /> is consistent with the neighborhood. Not granting the setback is arbitrary and capricious because <br /> Page 8 of 24 <br />