My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2020 4:02:23 PM
Creation date
11/17/2020 4:02:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, October 12,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Johnson replied yes, potentially that is what it means. <br /> Mr. Murphy asked if that is a practical difficulty. <br /> Johnson said not in his definition. <br /> Mayor Walsh again said they cannot create their own practical difficulty by rebuilding. <br /> Mr. Murphy said he is not creating the code, so isn't that code creating the practical difficulty for <br /> him? He noted it is a very old structure and the roof is falling in. <br /> Mayor Walsh said he guesses he could see the argument that if they had to tear the roof off <br /> because it is falling apart and instead of 2x4's they had to use 2x12's, then use 2x12's and if that <br /> makes it go up 3, 4, or 5 inches, he thinks that would be a practical difficulty, but not going way <br /> up like what is shown in the packet/onscreen. <br /> Mr. Murphy responded he would still have to come in for a variance at that point. <br /> Johnson said yes. <br /> Mayor Walsh said that would be a practical difficulty if the Applicant said they were going to <br /> replace the roof as-is, but code requires raising it up 4 inches because they must use 2x12's <br /> instead of 2x4's. <br /> Mr. Murphy stated when they started the design process and he found out he would need a <br /> variance because it is a non-compliant roof, he noted there is a little part that was brought into <br /> question because if they did anything on there he would have to get a variance for it. At that <br /> point,the Applicant said they should match the architecture of the house, then showed it to the <br /> neighbors who were much more supportive of that than the original design. <br /> Mayor Walsh said they are not in the design business but are trying to tell Mr. Murphy what he <br /> can get and what a practical difficulty is. He said he would not have a problem granting the <br /> variance for the additional space needed for the lumber to bring the roof to code. <br /> Johnson asked if they would be redoing the side walls. <br /> Mr. Murphy said no, they aren't changing the side walls but now they will have to. <br /> Mayor Walsh said if the trusses need to be 4 inches higher for code, that is a practical difficulty <br /> and the Applicant can have that, but anything beyond that is not a practical difficulty. <br /> Walsh moved, Seals seconded, to table LA20-000056, 3249 Casco Circle, Variance. VOTE: <br /> Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> Page 7 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.