Laserfiche WebLink
Response: Homeowner has what is known as a back lot. Therefore further restricting his rear setback. The <br /> 45 set-back is overly burdensome compared to the other lots in this area who would be compliant with 30 <br /> foot set-backs. <br /> 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which sa <br /> land is located. <br /> Response: Homeowner has what is known as a back lot. Therefore further restricting his rear setback. The <br /> 45 set-back is overly burdensome compared to the other lots in this area who would be compliant with 30 <br /> foot set-backs. <br /> 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br /> substantial property right of the applicant. <br /> Response: The existing deck (as acquired in 2016) adjacent to the gabled section and proposed extension <br /> already extends 7 of the proposed 10 ft addition. This creates practical difficulties for the owner in creating <br /> useful and enjoyable space modifications off the existing home. <br /> 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, <br /> morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. <br /> Response: The proposed variance will in no way impair health, safety, comfort or in any other respect be <br /> contrary to the intent of the zoning code. <br /> 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is <br /> necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. <br /> Response: The special back-lot restriction on a modest addition of 10 feet extending out the back of this <br /> home (extra doors near the kitchen for safety) to provide better back yard/patio access is a practical <br /> difficulty. <br />