08-17-2020 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA20-000054 he property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by L., Zoning Chapter. Response: The use of this property and additional space proposed are in line with typical zoning codes in this area. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The existing deck (as acquired in 2016) adjacent to the gabled section and proposed extension already extends 7 of the proposed 10 ft addition. This creates practical difficulties for the owner in creating useful and enjoyable space modifications off the existing home. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The addition variance of less than 10 would not alter the character or directly impact any nearby neighbors as the addition is not in-line with any structures with respect to the back neighboring lot and there is significant large maple tree vegetation between structures. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: The special back-lot restriction on a modest addition of 10 feet extending out the back of this h—le (extra doors near the kitchen for safety) to provide better back yard/patio access is a practical .ulty. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: The addition variance of less than 10 would not alter the character or directly impact any nearby neighbors as the addition is not in-line with any structures with respect to the back neighboring lot and there is significant large maple tree vegetation between structures. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: The 45 set-back is overly burdensome compared to the other lots in this area who would be compliant with 30 foot set-backs. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such ierty or immediately adjoining property.