Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,July 13,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to approve Resolution 7110, LA19-000050—Paul Vogstrom o/b/o <br /> Eric Vogstrom,2710 Pence Lane,Variances -Amended Resolution/Exhibit with a notation the <br /> Applicant also incur the maximum allowable after-the-fact variance expenses. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays <br /> 0. <br /> 17. ALLOW A SECOND DOCK AT DOCK SITE A <br /> Staff presented a summary of packet information. <br /> Mr. Jon Eiss, 3445 Crystal Bay Road, thanked the Council for approving the docks. He said he wanted <br /> everyone to know he is not flouting the rules or disrespecting them. He truly believed the second boat was <br /> allowable and did not put the second boat in until he got approval from the Lake Minnetonka Watershed <br /> District(LMCD)that his dock configuration was allowable. He referred to an email from Barnhart which <br /> stated"If you can get something in writing from the LMCD that two boats are permitted, that will satisfy <br /> the city." He said he wrote an email to the LMCD asking if he could have the second boat and gave them <br /> a diagram of how the dock would be, and they responded, "After reviewing the matter described below, <br /> LMCD staff and legal counsel have determined that the LMCD will allow the dockage arrangement <br /> between the City of Orono and residents of Crystal Bay."He said when Barnhart came over and said he <br /> could not have the second boat, he took the boat out. There was a period of less than 48 hours that the <br /> boat was in when he knew it wasn't allowed. He believed he had done what was asked of him. <br /> Walsh apologized for the confusion and stated the City struggled to find a vehicle to get that because they <br /> wanted to solve the issues to begin with. It is an odd and unique situation there. The City is pretty clear <br /> saying that, regardless of what the LMCD says,the license is for one boat. <br /> Seals commented that the LMCD is not exactly her favorite organization and people should not trust what <br /> they say because they have been giving conflicting information for years about many topics such as <br /> Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS). She said she appreciated that once Mr. Eiss knew the second boat was <br /> not supposed to be there, he took it out. The license for one boat is somewhat of a gift because it was not <br /> always there. She thinks the Council should stick with the original plan which was enacted recently. She <br /> is comfortable and confident that one boat per dock is the appropriate way to go. If the Council wants to <br /> do something different down the road, she recommended pulling in Orono's LMCD rep. <br /> Crosby stated the Council is flexible and forward-thinking and came up with a way to allow the <br /> homeowners to have one boat and he does not see a reason to change that. <br /> Crosby moved, Seals seconded, to deny the request to Allow a Second Dock at Dock Site A. VOTE: <br /> Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> 18. LA19-000084—JULIE THOMETZ O/B/O 1350 BALDUR LLC,BALDUR PARK ROAD, <br /> SKETCH PLAN <br /> Staff presented a summary of packet information. <br /> Johnson asked for the aerial photo to be displayed and noted there was some information included about <br /> four docks and also docks out at the point. He asked Rief to display the different years available for the <br /> aerial photo. He also asked if any of the Council Members received an email about the docks. <br /> Page 12 of 19 <br />