My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-13-2020 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2020
>
07-13-2020 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2020 2:40:02 PM
Creation date
7/28/2020 2:39:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,July 13, 2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Johnson said he saw the yellow in the photo but thought that was relevant to height. <br /> Barnhart clarified that was for new segments. <br /> Crosby asked if there was a picture of what was originally approved. <br /> Barnhart, after the survey was displayed, indicated the survey was also in the packet on page 16. <br /> Seals stated it looks reasonable but it is annoying that the owner created this and feels like they have the <br /> only challenging property in Orono, and that the City Council comes upon a lot of challenging properties. <br /> Barnhart indicated the survey shown was the original approval for the stairs. <br /> Several Council Members commented that the new segment does not look that much different than the <br /> original proposal but that, instead of coming straight up, they went at an angle. <br /> Walsh noted the owners need to get down to the lake. The Council approved a way to get down to the <br /> lake. The owner changed the direction of part of the retaining wall. He asked what the real difference is <br /> that the City is getting upset about. <br /> Barnhart said when the Council approved the variance, they approved the plan on pages 16-17. What the <br /> owners have since done is different. The way Staff writes the resolution is that the Council is saying they <br /> approve a particular plan. If there is a modification, that is something the Council should approve. The <br /> stairs is a change, it is approvable, and once the permit is received, he will approve the changes. He does <br /> not see a huge issue other than the annoyance factor. The findings the Council made when the original <br /> approval was done still hold, and that is why he can support the modification to the plan. <br /> Walsh noted you need the most reasonably direct distance down. Because they are coming from the side, <br /> cutting sideways into the hill and coming down, they are going to have different boulder wall issues <br /> because they are cutting into the hill very differently. <br /> Johnson asked if the new plan increased hardcover. <br /> Barnhart said they have gotten revised hardcover calculations for this and the other projects the owner is <br /> proposing, and they are within the 25%. <br /> Crosby stated if it is something that the Council would have approved anyway, the Council will approve <br /> it. <br /> Walsh added the Council is not happy to be approving finished construction, basically. <br /> Crosby said the City should draw a hard line in the sand so the owner knows if they come to the City for <br /> something after the fact, even if the Council would have approved it, it's not going to be approved. <br /> Walsh brought up the boathouse which the Council made the owner deconstruct and said the stairway is <br /> different because, although they changed the angle, they are still allowed the most reasonable access to <br /> get down. The owner should have said something upfront. He stated this has been done multiple times. <br /> Johnson asked Staff if he told the owner to stop construction. <br /> Page 10 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.