Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #LA20-000025 <br />27 April 2020 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br /> <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the <br />requested variance will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; The <br />Commission should determine whether the modest expansion negates to goals of the <br />code in relation to views into, and out of the property. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The applicant asserts that the <br />variances are necessary and will not merely serve as a convenience to the owners. <br /> <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis: <br />Staff finds the applicant’s request for variance to allow a minimal building adjustment, a <br />downward expansion offset by lowering of the overall peak height is reasonable. The variance is <br />supported by the practical difficulties resulting from the existing building location on the <br />property, as well as the existing elevations of the floor and ceiling. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br />To date, no public comments have been received. <br /> <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the neighborhood? <br />3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br />impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance allowing the <br />minor downward volume expansion for the open-sided building. <br /> <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. Application & Narrative <br />Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br />Exhibit C. Existing Survey <br />Exhibit D. Site Plan <br />Exhibit E. Proposed Plans and Elevations <br />Exhibit F. Aerial Photos <br />Exhibit G. Existing Building Photos <br />Exhibit H. Hardcover Calculations <br />Exhibit I. Property Owners List <br />Exhibit J. Plat Map