My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-30-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2020
>
03-30-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2020 3:43:17 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 2:52:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 9, 2020 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />19. LA20-000009 — DON GAMBLE OB/O RICHARD A AND KIM A EDWARDS, 2480 AND <br />2474 CARMAN STREET, SKETCH PLAN <br />Barnhart stated the sketch plan is a proposal to split two lots down the middle which exist on a shoreline. <br />This will create two lots north of the inlet and two lots south of the inlet. The applicant represents both <br />property owners for this purpose. The lot has two different zoning districts: the north lot requires a''/z-acre <br />zone, and the area south is a minimum of 1 acre. The two lots north of the inlet conform to lot area and <br />lots width. The two lots south cannot meet the lot area requirements. In addition, the parcel to the west <br />cannot meet the lot width requirement. The project is predicated upon the Council's support of some <br />waivers or variances to allow additional lots. Not a lot of work has been done because the City Council <br />historically has not supported additional density at the lakeshore. <br />Johnson, referencing the displayed aerial photograph, asked if the yellow line down the middle is the <br />existing property line, <br />Barnhart stated he was correct <br />Barnhart indicated the Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan and recognized the inherent <br />challenges with the amount of land but did not support a waiver. <br />Mr. Don Gamble, 10704 Water Lily Lane, Woodbury, said he grew up on Lake Minnetonka and knows <br />the lake very well. It is a unique property and situation. The south properties cannot be conforming <br />because they are not attached to other land; the north properties would be conforming if they were on <br />their own. Looking through a lot of the historical information on City planning and Navarre planning, <br />everyone has noticed the lots and said, "What a great opportunity." But it is only a great opportunity if <br />they are on their own. He does not know what would happen to them if they could not be split off. He <br />indicated the south houses are nonconforming whether the north portions of the lot are there or not. <br />Walsh asked Mr. Gamble whether he represented the property owners. <br />Mr. Gamble said he does; he is a real estate developer/broker. <br />Mr. Gamble said the properties have been for sale at times and there are two different buyers: people that <br />want the houses or want the land; they don't want both. He stated he talked to the City to see if they had <br />any interest in having commercial in the area. The City indicated they could not change zoning. He said <br />various Councils and community interests have thought about what to do and what can happen there. <br />Johnson stated the City Council does not have a history of making subdivisions to create nonconformity. <br />Mr. Gamble noted it was not creating a nonconformity. <br />Johnson said making four parcels instead of two does create nonconformity for two of the four. <br />Seals asked if the property could be created into three parcels. <br />Page 12 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.