My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-30-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2020
>
03-30-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2020 3:43:17 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 2:52:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 9, 2020 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />18. LA19-000102 — KEVIN CLARK O/B/O YMCA GREATER TWIN CITIES, 135 ORONO <br />ORCHARD ROAD <br />Barnhart said this was a sketch plan review for property owned by Gordon James Construction. They are <br />proposing a five -lot subdivision and the property owner has a plan which meets the City's Ordinances. <br />Generally, the lots meet the size requirements of 2 acres of drive/buildable. The middle lot is challenging <br />in that there are steep slopes and substantial vegetation. A couple lots don't meet the width requirements, <br />but that is easily remedied. The new road appears to meet the requirements for width and length, and the <br />cul-de-sac meets the City Ordinances. Because Lot 1 has frontage on Orono Orchard Road, that is <br />technically the front yard; the width, measured at the front yard setback, is approximately 50 feet. <br />Councilmembers and Barnhart discussed options regarding Lot 1 given the lot's configurations. <br />Barnhart said Lot 2 also does not meet the lot width requirement, which is not uncommon and is seen <br />quite a bit when looking at cul-de-sac lots. One option would be to extend the outlot to get additional <br />frontage on Lot 1. That may impact a portion of Lot 4 or Lot 5. <br />Walsh indicated the property presents its own practical difficulty because of the layout. <br />Councilmembers and Staff discussed the location of the easement through Lot 3 and whether anything <br />was underneath it. Barnhart stated he does not believe so, based on Orono's and Long Lake's utility maps, <br />but would need to look at the language of the easement to see if it could be moved. <br />Barnhart indicated he is looking for reaction to the layout and the road network and if the Council sees <br />any red flags other than what he mentioned. He knows more detail will be necessary including septic <br />sites, grading, and the road plan. <br />Johnson asked whose easement it was. <br />Barnhart stated it might be the Met Council. <br />Seals suggested learning more about the easement. She said she likes the plan much better than the earlier <br />one and likes the fact that every lot is different. She said it is going in the right direction. <br />Walsh, Crosby, and Johnson agreed with Seals. <br />Mr. John Quinlivan, Gordon James Construction, 5159 Main Street, Maple Plain, explained they have <br />talked about taking the triangle on the front, bend the road a little, and dedicate the corner to a monument. <br />He stated the lot line between Lot 1 and Lot 2 could be moved far enough to do a swap and still be within <br />the appropriate numbers. <br />Johnson asked if that would keep Lot 1 at 2 acres. <br />Mr. Quinlivan said it would keep Lot 1 at 2 acres by rotating the line. He noted there is not a lot of room <br />to play around with lot lines, so the final rendition will be close to what the sketch plan is. <br />No action was taken at this time. <br />Page 11 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.