Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 27, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 7 of 21 <br /> <br />4. #15-3711 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND CHAPTER 86-68 TO MODIFY SURVEY <br />REQUIREMENTS FOR MINOR PROJECTS/ADDITIONS (continued) <br /> <br />Mattick stated he understands the Council would like something drafted that is beneficial to the property <br />but still give the City a comfort level as it relates to review. Mattick stated one issue encountered on <br />plans is the level of detail that is included. Mattick stated while a plan may look reasonable, if a wetland <br />is not depicted on the survey, it becomes a whole different issue and a signed survey would prevent <br />situations like that. Mattick stated Staff will be looking at the plans and, on behalf of the City, say that it <br />looks right, but that issues could come up if there is not a signed survey. Mattick stated Staff will take <br />another look at it to see if some thresholds could be created. <br /> <br />Printup asked if someone would be able to hand sketch something on an as-built survey. <br /> <br />Curtis stated it would depend on the age of the survey. Curtis stated what the City required 15 years ago <br />might be different than what is required be put on a survey today. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she understands the issues with the expense and that the Council has struggled with this <br />for a number of years. McMillan stated she hates to have the added expense but she would also hate to <br />have someone construct something incorrectly, which could put Staff in a tough position. <br /> <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to table Application No. 15-3711, City of Orono, Amend Chapter <br />86-68 to Modify Survey Requirements for Minor Projects/Additions. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />5. #15-3722 STORMWATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK FEE – SECOND REVIEW <br /> <br />Senior Planner Gaffron stated the Council has a draft ordinance based on the assumption that the Council <br />accepts the original dollar amount per acre and equivalency factors for the zoning districts. Before the <br />Council tonight is a chart that looks at the existing base fee that is currently charged per acre for all <br />acreage in a subdivision. For five acres, it is $3,075 per acre. The equivalency factors date back to 2000 <br />when the Council looked at larger lots and determined that they do not have as much of an impact on <br />stormwater. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the City received a letter late this afternoon regarding the ordinance amendment from <br />Homestead Partners, who is looking at developing a property located on Old Crystal Bay Road. The <br />letter suggests that they like the idea of the City looking at amending the ordinance and that they would <br />like the Council to look at what the fees were 15 years ago compared to what they are today, which would <br />require a study if the Council is interested in going in that direction. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the proposed ordinance is in draft form at this time and this is an opportunity for the <br />Council to provide Staff with clear direction as to what code revisions the Council desires. The draft <br />ordinance is based on the idea that reapportionment really is not something the Council will do. The <br />reapportionments result in a situation where the fees for large lots and the fees for small lots are closer <br />together and the second option is where the small lots have a greater fee than the larger lots. Gaffron <br />stated the second option really is not sustainable in Staff’s view. <br /> <br />The third line on the chart reflects a per lot fee based on standard zone acreage. Gaffron stated under this <br />option if there is a 5-acre zone, the person will pay for a 5-acre lot even if it is greater than five acres, <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/11/2015 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 04/27/15 [Page 7 of 21]