My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
05-11-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 10:51:02 AM
Creation date
7/15/2015 10:44:14 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 27, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 6 of 21 <br /> <br />4. #15-3711 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND CHAPTER 86-68 TO MODIFY SURVEY <br />REQUIREMENTS FOR MINOR PROJECTS/ADDITIONS (continued) <br /> <br />Walsh stated this is a survey requirement issue. Walsh stated to his recollection the Council had <br />discussed some language previously about allowing some leeway, which would hopefully resolve 80 or <br />90 percent of those issues without requiring professional signatures. Walsh stated he would like to make <br />it easy for someone to build a small deck. <br /> <br />McMillan stated part of the issue is hardcover or setbacks. <br /> <br />Walsh stated the person would still need to submit the plan to the City and that he would like to get the <br />small projects past this problem. Walsh stated the draft ordinance does not address that. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the City needs to find something consistent across the board and that each situation is <br />different. <br /> <br />Walsh stated every project will now require a number of signatures. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated the City already requires that. <br /> <br />Walsh stated he does not want to overburden people who would like to do a small project, which is what <br />the City is doing right now. <br /> <br />Curtis stated Staff could perhaps come up with some thresholds or exemptions for the Council’s <br />consideration. Curtis stated Staff did attempt to do that with this ordinance and the criteria became a little <br />muddy. Curtis stated Staff will review to see if some criteria can be developed. <br /> <br />McMillan stated even with a small project, there might be issues with wetlands, hardcover, setbacks, or <br />something else. McMillan stated Staff wants to be able to have ways to look at something and be able to <br />determine what that threshold is without just arbitrarily saying they will let this one slide or requiring a <br />signed survey in one case and not another. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if a building permit is required for a deck. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it is. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the deck would also need to be inspected, which requires Staff time. McMillan stated the <br />question is whether the homeowner should pay the money to have it surveyed. <br /> <br />Printup stated he understands what Council Member Walsh is saying about the small projects. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if it helps the building inspector to have a survey. <br /> <br />Curtis stated it would depend on the project and the property. <br /> <br />McMillan suggested Staff perhaps come up with some examples for thresholds. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/11/2015 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 04/27/15 [Page 6 of 21]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.