Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 13, 2020 <br />6:03 o'clock p.m. <br />Barnhart agreed and said that is why he expects them to be part of Lots 1, 2, and 3 and that is part of the <br />plat. <br />Printup stated it should be made clear early and often. <br />Walsh commented that the residents will want their boats on the water. He said at the Planning <br />Commission it looked like everything had been well -thought out. <br />Johnson said he likes the plan and it makes sense to keep the driveway at that location. Although it was <br />only a single-family residence, there was a lot of activity at that property and he is not concerned about <br />the increase in traffic. If the County would allow a turn lane in both directions, that would be terrific. <br />Council members agreed it looked like a good plan. <br />Barnhart said they will continue to work with the developer. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br />Seals said a lot of people are stuck at home and she thanked everyone who is working. <br />Printup stated it is nice to see the American flags up along the streets. He thanked Jackie H., who made <br />some homemade masks. He said there are some restaurants who are petitioning the Governor regarding <br />takeout of alcohol from restaurants and said Orono may want to send the Governor a letter encouraging <br />that if the Council is interested in pursuing that idea. <br />Johnson said he was going to propose sending a letter to the Governor but after hearing the LMCD rep, he <br />thought it would be better to leave it as status quo. He stated he wanted to bring to the Council's attention <br />his concern about code enforcement. He received a complaint about a dock installation on Crystal Bay <br />Road, which brings the number to 2 for docks that should not be in yet. There is a new construction <br />project going on which the City approved multiple variances on. The dock was installed prior to getting <br />the final approval on the framing, which needs to happen before the dock can be put in according to code. <br />He felt people should be able to have a dock without having a house and didn't want the language in the <br />code at all. He received a follow-up from Barnhart that the framing would be done in 2-3 weeks and by <br />the time the City does the code enforcement action, the property owner would be in the clear so Staff was <br />not going to pursue the violation. He told Barnhart the choices as he saw them: the City enforces the <br />codes, or the City amends the codes. He thinks the City has done a very good job over the years of <br />amending codes that do not make sense. It is concerning to him when they choose to follow up on some <br />code violations and not others. He does not think that is how the City should be handling the issue. The <br />other dock on Crystal Bay Road went in without a permit. There is some question if they meet the 10- <br />yard setback with the one that went in; the dock that is existing prior to the permit might not be in the <br />right spot. That is part of why it is important to have dimensions on drawings. He also wants to make sure <br />the rental agreement says 10 feet from the sideline. <br />Seals said Johnson brought up a good point and it makes sense to enforce codes. She does not understand <br />how it is okay for the City to say, "Well, they will put the dock in in a few weeks so I won't enforce it." It <br />seems like individuals are picking and choosing when to enforce, and it seems a little suspect. <br />Page 22 of 25 <br />