Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTLS OI+TITL <br /> ORONO PLANI�TING C011'I11'IISSION � O <br /> 11�onday, Sepi:ember 19, 2005 � � <br /> 6:00 o'clocic p.m. �/ <br /> V� _ <br /> � <br /> 4. Wilh regards to ihe placemenl of limitations on the applicant's use, does Che Planning <br /> Conimission wrsh to suggesC any paraineters for hours of outdoor operaCion or propose any guid.elines for <br /> its limited trial basis? <br /> 5. The Orono Police Deparlment llas been requested to have a representative aC the <br /> � � September 19 meeting if possible. Are there aiiy specif c issues thai:the Police De1�arlmenC should <br /> '. address? <br /> ' 6. Have the noise issues been adequately addressed? <br /> � If the Plaiming Coilunission concludes that no further plan revisions are necessary and tllat any remaining <br /> issues should be addressed by the City Council,lhen it��ould be appropiiate to fon�ard a <br /> reconunendation on tlus application to the Council. <br /> Anderst noted a noise study was also completed. <br /> Gaffron stated the noise study is included in the Plaiuiing Coi�zission packets,with tl�e consultant also <br /> being available at touight's meeting to ans���er questions. <br /> Sylvia T'rank,Architect, indicated tI1e�lan is to elinunate the center vestibule completely and to make au <br /> emergency exit near tlie stage. <br /> Leslie i�iquired whether Lhe layout of the doors lias been finalized on any of the plans submi�ted to the <br /> City. <br /> I'rank scated the code does not require those doors to Ue there and they could Ue closed off and niade into <br /> wiiido���s. <br /> Rahn opened the��ublic hearing. � <br /> Lois IIudlow, 3438 Lyric Avenue, staCed the noise sludy speci.�ically addresses tlle south sicle ol'the <br /> IJLIIIC�117b and that she resides oti lhe itorlh side of lhe Uuilding. IIudlow staled in l�er opinion a i�aise study <br /> should have been con�pleled a.s well on the nor(li side,noting her residence overlooks lhe parkiz�g lot. <br /> PAGL 7 <br />