Laserfiche WebLink
nzlnTuT�s or rziL �� /Q <br /> , ORONO PLAIVIVING COMMISSION �'4! <br /> 11'Iond���, Septeznl�er 19, 2�05 �'�.4 <br /> G:00 o'clocic p.m. �� <br /> � � <br /> 13enshooP &AssociaCes as well as the findings aud comments made by Si�e]ly Johnson, tl�e Cily's iraffic <br /> caisultailt and cletermirie whetl�er adequ�le parldng is availaUle. <br /> Gaffi�on statecl the applicauis have addressed a number of conceiils of tlie Planning Con-ulussion raised at <br /> the July meeting�nd have suU�:ilii:ted revised plans refJecting tl�ose changes and have also subuiitLed a <br /> � � parlcing shidy. <br /> Gaffi-ou noted the City Council lias ldopted an ordinance establishing a moratorium with respect lo <br /> development in tl�e Navarre area since the July Plaiuiing Conu-nission mecting. G�ffi-on pointed out the <br /> Narrows application is not subject to tl�e moratoriuill since the moratorium was adopted afie��the Narrows <br /> application `��as received by the City. <br /> Stafffinds that the applic�nts have substantially addressed the reconul7endations and requests of the <br /> Planning Conuiussion, including reductiou of the outdoor seating in the rear, elinunation of the exterior <br /> ltitchen and vestiUule additions, elimination of the outdoor seating along Shoreline Drive, and provision <br /> of tlie results of a parlcing shidy conducted by the applicant's consultants. <br /> The Planning Comuiission should consider whether the issues identified at tlie July meeting have been <br /> adequately addressed and v��heti�er any issues need fiuther consideration. Specifical.ly, it is reconunended <br /> that the Plamiing Conunission revie���the following: <br /> 1. Has ihe�arlcing shidy pro��ided suff cienL info�.7nation to conclude whether adequate parlcing will <br /> be available foz-the proposed use or for future uses of lhe municipal parking lot? Should.this Uusiness be <br /> li�.nited in its e�pansion if ifs expausion n.ligb.t affect future expa�Isions of olher businesses or business <br /> spaces? <br /> 2. IIas tlie outdoor seaCing coz�iponei�t of the applicalion been suff cienC reduced f;o a.level thaC is <br /> reasonable and Chal mininuzes the negative in7pacts of the grealer expansiozi of this area? <br /> 3. Has ilie ouldoor seatin�been adec�uately screened7 A.re tl�e i�zetllods o�'scrcening aesthetically <br /> acceptable and zn lceepiiig willi the nei�;hborhood? <br /> PAGL 6 <br />