Laserfiche WebLink
� #05-3121 N�rro�i�s Saloon �xpinsion <br /> Octobc►•6,2005 <br /> P�ge) <br /> (Tllc builclings �s nunlbered go west to e�sl �ncl souih io north with the mosi <br /> westerl ret�tilh•est�urant buildin� as #1 aucl the C�ribou Cofree/oI'fice as #6) <br /> E?�IST[NG OIt GROSS <br /> I3UILllING CiJRRCNTLY SQUAR� R�Q'D RGQ'll # OF <br /> PROPOSGD USE FOOTAGE 1'ARKING STALLS <br /> I Retlil/Restaurant 5088/1000 1/150 & 1/80 34 & 12.5 <br /> 2 P�etail (I�arclwai•e) 9300 1/150 62 <br /> 3 Restaurant 5267 1/80 66 <br /> 4 Motor rue] 2240 3 + 2 per � <br /> service stall <br /> 5 Ret�il 990 1/150 7 <br /> 6 Restaurant/Office 1442/415 1/80 & 1/200 18 & 2 <br /> TOTAL 208.5 stalls <br /> As noted earlier, the inunicipal lot contauis 129 stalls with 30 additional stalls on <br /> private property. It should be noted, however that Section 78-1516 bases the <br /> amount of required parking for retail sales and service esiablislunents on net floor <br /> lrea and not gross square footages (wluch is ihe square footage noted above). If <br /> each retail establislunent's iiet floor area alone were nleasured, the amotuit of <br /> � parking would be reduced, probably by approaiinately 20% based on other <br /> published fornntlas for figuring retail parkiilg. This is because areas of private <br /> accessory of£'ices, batlu•ooms, storage rooms, mechanical areas, etc. are not figured <br /> into square footage for required parking. 20% of 208.5 stalls is 41.7 stalls, reducing <br /> the fiotal to approxiinately 1C7 stalls, as compared to 159 stalls available per the <br /> Benshoof count. <br /> It sl�ould be noted thlt the existin� buildings adjacent to the intuiicipal plrlcing lot <br /> appelr to be occupied to the m��innun e�teilt possible (without consti'llC�lllg <br /> �dditions). TI11S 1S 1111��UI't�ill� veC�i1.15e 1S 1'e��11I S1105 �I1Cl 52TV1C0 �5t1U1151ll11�11�S CO111E <br /> and go within the e�15t1I1� ULl1�C�ll1�5� iotal �mount ol pacicing ihey deniand will <br /> remain st�.gn�nt. The only firttu•e use chauges within ihe e�isting builclings tllat <br /> would izlcrease the rec�uired �tnzount of plrking, would be conversion of sp�ce ri•om <br /> retail/olrce to a rest�ur�nt 1nd/or bar use, which h1s a higher parking requirement <br /> per the Zoning Ordin�nce. Such a conversion requires �pprov�l oC a conditionll use <br /> peril�it �tncl review by the Plauuing Commissioli ai�.d City Council, iriggering � <br /> parlcing review prior to each such conversion. <br />