My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
03-13-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2015 2:19:08 PM
Creation date
7/14/2015 2:18:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
379
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�105-3121 Narrows Saloon �xpausion _ <br /> Octobcr G,2005 <br /> P.�ge 4 <br /> The l�ossible regionzl dr�w of the entert�iiunent aspects or the ex���tnded use should be <br /> : consic�ered iii determining whether the proposed use has the potential fio become <br /> incomj�atible wiih the City's goals for Navarre or with the surroundiilg residential <br /> developmeilt. Council should consider wheiher the exp�usion m�y push tl�e sire or <br /> maguitude of the use beyond the scale that is comp�tible witli tlie Slll'1'O1111Cllllg; <br /> neighborhood. <br /> '. 3. Consistencv with Zonin�Code Stlnci�rds. <br /> � a) Lo�Stan�lcrrcl.s. <br /> � 1) Lot Are�. The loi: arel at 13,656 s,f. is short oI'the reqLiired 20,000 s.f for <br /> . a building lot in the B-1 District. Because the building is existing, � lot <br /> � area vari�uice is not required. <br /> ' 2) Lot Width. The e�isting lot widih of 112' is conforming with ihe B-1 100' <br /> mininnim. <br /> 3) Setbacks. The eaisting building does not meet the B-1 setback standards <br /> for frout or side setbacks. These setbacks are not proposed to change, ai�d <br /> do not require a variance. The proposed rear vestibule addition meets the <br /> required 15' side and 35' rear setbacks, hence no variauce is required. The <br /> � proposed outside seating area at the rear of ihe building will be enclosed <br /> : � by fenciiig, is not considered part of the builciing for• setback purposes, and <br /> no variance is required. <br /> � 4) Required Yards. The existing building does not meet the B-1 `front yard' <br /> requireinent of 20', but no change is proposed other than to potentially fill <br /> in the existing entryway indents to be flush with the remainder of the front <br /> facade. Tlus does not require a variauce. The existing building and <br /> proposed rear vestibule additioii nleet the 30' re�tr yard reqttirement, and <br /> ihe proposed 5'-6' Pence and pla�ltings do not constitute an enci•olclunent <br /> on the rear yard, heilce no v�riance is required. <br /> 5) II�rdcover. The site is in the 500-100' hardcover zone �nd cont�ins <br /> virtually 100% h�rdcover. The proposed Uermed planting area abutting ihe <br /> outcioor seaiing has tl�e potential to reduce liardcover by �pproximately <br /> 150 s.f or down to 98.9%. No ilew hlrcicover is being added, but the <br /> vestibule converls 88 s.P, of pavetneui to structure. <br /> 6) Loi Coverage by Structures. �xistiilg lot covez•age by S�;YLiCtUl'eS is <br /> �pproximately 5,266 s,f (38.G`%�) where oi11y 15% is �llowed I'or any lot <br /> ]ess thail 2 acres ii1 are�. The 88 s.l�. rear vestibule i�lcre�s�s stt•uctur�l <br /> cover�ge to 5,354 s.t'. (39.2`%) This is a miuor iiicrease that teclulically <br /> requires � v�ri�uce. The only al�plrent harclship or ,jlistircation lor ihe <br /> increase, is that cre�ting �n iniernal veslibule to contain sounci auct for <br /> energy efCiciency, t�lces space out ol the e�isting Iloor pl�ti. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.