03-13-2006 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING - IVlonday,October 10, 2005 7:00 o'clock p.m. (#OS-3121 Narrows Saloon, Continued) 1. The applicant shall install a two-door system at the rear enYrance to meet all State Building and Pire Code standards. The putpose of the doors would be to allow customers to enter and exit the building without allowing noise to leave the building. Tlley should Ue spaced so one door would close before the second door is opened. All doors shall remain closed at all times, except when entering or existing the building. 2. Live entertainment will end at 12:30 a.m. each night and the Saloon shall close at 1:00 a.m. each night. 3. The fi-ont door shall not be used as an enh•ance during the period of time the building is used for live entertainment. A one-year time period is required for the applicant to monitor the use of the building and the front enn•ance. After one year, the City of Orono will review the use of the building in relation to the live entertaimnent and noise levels generated by the live entertainment use. Gaffron noteci there have been complaints received that the doors have been propped open and noise goes out into the neigllborhood. Gaffron stated this concein could be addressed by a different door design and by ihe Nan�ows' management. 4. The property is subject to the sign ordinance for temporary and pernlanent signs. No signs can Ue located on or outside the building without receivin�a pern�it from the City of Orono. 5. Noise shall be held to a level as to not be in violation of the Noise Ordinance. 6. The sale of intoxicating liqttor requires the business have a valid liquor license with the City of Orono. Gaffron noted a history of the liquor license a�plications has been provided to Council. Gaffron indicated the applicant would Ue required to apply for revisions to the cuirent liquor license in conjunction with any approved expansion. Gaffron noted a moratorium was adopted by the City Council in July with respect to development in the Navaire area. The Council indicated at the time the moratorium was adopted that the Nai7�ows application was not intended io Ue subject to the moratorium; however, the language of the moratorium ordinance ei7�aneously does not specifically eaclude the Nan•ows, or any other properties, for tivhich a zoning application was made pi•ior to the moratorium effective date. Staff recommends the following issues be considered Uy the Council: 1. Is the proposed location of the use in accord wifll the obj ectives of the Zoning Code and the purposes of t11e B-1 District and the Co�nprehensive Plan? �AG� fl�