My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
03-13-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2015 2:19:08 PM
Creation date
7/14/2015 2:18:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
379
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> R <br /> 3. The proposed plat consists oF two residenti�l lots each meeting the <br /> minimum lot area requirement of ihe RR — 1 A, One Pamily Rural <br /> Resiclenti�l Goning District each meeting a minimum of 5 acres of <br /> contiguous dry buildable lanci. <br /> 4. The proposed subdivision ro create residential lots of five acres in area or <br /> larger conforms to the provision of the RR-lA Zoning District and the <br /> Rural Residential guiding as established in the Orono 2000-2020 <br /> Community Management Plan, with the following exceptions: <br /> a. Proposed Lot 1, Block 1, as shown on the survey by Meyer-Rohlin, <br /> Inc., dated January 24, 2006, has a width of 220.68' and requires a <br /> variance from the minimum 300' width requirement as established by <br /> the RR-lA, One Family Rural Residential Zoning District. <br /> b. Proposed Lot 2, Block 1, as shown on the survey by Meyer-Rohlin, <br /> Ine., dated January 24, 2006, has a width of 270.19' and requires a <br /> variance from the minimum 300' width requirement as established by <br /> the RR-lA, One Family Rural Residential Zoning District <br /> 5. The required variances to lot width are justified by the existing width of <br /> the property; the fact that no additional land is available to be acquired to <br /> gain the necessary width; that platting of a front-back lot configuration <br /> would be impractical due to the topography related to the proposed <br /> building pad locations; and that the existing home and outbuildings as well <br /> as proposed residence structures can easily meet all setback requirements. <br /> 6. Both proposed Lots 1 and 2 will be served with private wells and septic <br /> systems. <br /> 7. Proposed Lot 2 coniains an existing house �nd four outbuildings all of <br /> which will remain. <br /> 8. Both proposed Lots 1 and 2 will be served ofF the existing driveway <br /> access from Townline Road. <br /> 9. The westerly 33 feet of the property will be dedicated as Townline Road <br /> public road right-of-way. <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.