02-27-2006 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#OS-31G1 November iG,2005 Page 6 of 6 3.85 total crc��es x 54,160 per cicre = �16,016.00 Utility Locations and Availability The property will be served by city sewer and ws ta eoflol osed1toil g ttwithiz he��ccess right-of-way of North Shore Drive. The utilitie p p outlots. A determination will be made as to whether additional sewer and water comiection charges will be required. Lakeshore Pro�imity and Conformity with Shoreland Regulations This property lies witl�in 1,000' of North Arm and Crystal Bay of Lalce Miimetonka requiring conformauce with the harc�cover reovidedlexist ng �lld pl�osedggardcovler Shoreland Overlay District. The applicaut has p calculation worksheets for all five lots�(al ri hed as Exhibits J-N). No hardcover variances are necessary under this propose p Wetl�►nds on Site and/or Impacted The only apparent wetland exists at the western end of the property, minimally impacting proposed lot 4. This wetland is classified as ak fiioinethatebuffergfor a totaltof 55� of 35' wetland buffer and a 20' structure setbac setback. The proposed building pad and drivewa n��ll be aeqeared. I11T1i t�M Sll ehalaa wetland setback. A buffer maintenance coven Creek Watershed District (MCWD) is the City's LGU far administration of the Wetland Conservation Act rules. Tree and/or Woodland Impacts The site is somewhat wooded with a variety of tree species. Orono does not have a tree preservation ordinance other than within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, where clear- cutting and removal of trees 6" or greater in dlelto retaiipthe wlooded chaaacter�of the encol�raged to preserve as many trees as possib property. The City Engineer reconunends tha e further exa niged lllg plan be submitted, upon which tree preservation vs. tree loss can b Issues for Discussion l. Cau the driveway within Outlot B be revised to meet a 10' setback from the westerly lot line and so as to not create any negative impacts to the westerly neighUor? 2. Should an additional 7' of right-of-way dedication to Hetulepin County be required to accommodate a firture right turn laue? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with tllis application? Staff Recommend�tio❑ Staff reconunends taUling the application to allow implementation of the City Engineer recoiiuliendations noted in the letter dated November 9, 2005 and attached as Exhibit O. This item will �lso be forwarded to the Park Commission for conullent.