My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
02-27-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2015 1:59:51 PM
Creation date
7/13/2015 1:59:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, February 13, 2006 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#OS-3131 Steve Bohl of Bohland Development, Continued) <br /> White commented the school pays for the striping on the trail between the iniddle school and the high <br /> school. <br /> White recommended the City Council discuss the six items raised by Planner Gaffi-on. <br /> The consensus of the City Council was that the revised setback for Lot 10 is acceptable. <br /> White inquired how the City Council feels about the floor area ratio and the points raised by Staff. <br /> Mu�hy stated he does not think the City Council should s�end a lot of time discussing whether three- <br /> season porches should be included in the FAR calculation. Muiphy stated that the open decks and three- <br /> season porches should probably be included in the calculation. Mur�hy stated there is some leeway to <br /> decide whether those types of structures should be included in the calculation. <br /> Bohl stated he did look at a few different options to reduce the amount of massing. Bohl stated he would <br /> like to exclude a screen parch fi-om the floor area ratio if the FAR is reduced to 0.4. Bohl stated the size <br /> of the screen porch could be regulated with covenants to a 12' by 14'. Bohl stated a four-season or three- <br /> season porch would be included within the floor area ratio. <br /> The City Council indicated they are in agreement with the comments made by the applicant. <br /> White inquired if the Council feels the church parcel should be exempt from the SW&DT fee. White <br /> stated in his view since the size of the church property is being reduced,that he would not be opposed to <br /> waiving the fee. <br /> Kellogg stated there is a drainage boundary depicted on the overhead and that currently the drainage in <br /> that portion of the propei-ty is not h-eated but would be treated in the future under the proposal and would <br /> be an improvement over what cun-ently exists. <br /> White inquired whether the City or the developer should be responsible for maintaining the trail. <br /> Murphy inquired who would inaintain the h-ail along the road. <br /> Gaffron stated the road itself would act as a trail and the City would be maintaining the road. <br /> White inquired who would be responsible for striping the street. <br /> Murphy inquired whether the City is equipped to stripe the roads at the present time. <br /> Moorse stated the City cunently hires someone to do the striping. <br /> PAGE 4 of'25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.