02-27-2006 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Debbie McNally December 15, 2005 Page 2 On March 24, 2004 the Pierponts were sent a notice of Council Action requesting that they sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices. On July 27, 2004, James Pierpont signed the resolutions. On August 23, 2004, Jtiidy Pierpont signed the resolutions and requested that the City make an inspection to confirn� the plumbing had been successfully removed. Note that the signatures and request for inspection came after the subdivision approval had already expired. To n�y lcnowledce, no City Inspector has made an inspection of the guest house pluulbing to confirm removals. The Pieiponts have never provided the City with the required title opinion nor the required replacement easement documentation. Due to expiration of the subdivision approval, the e�cessive passage of time between the dates of tlie various approvals and the actual execution of the CUP documents and plumbing modifications, and c�ue to lack of followi.ip by the applicants with re�ard to the subdivision approval requirements, none of the resolutions have ever been forwarded to the City Attorney for filing. In November, 2005 the City received a request for a building permit for 1849 West Farm Road with a survey showing that property in its pre-stibclivision, intact condition, not reflecting any lot line rearrangement. City staff then requested that the purchaser of the property provide a copy of the deed, which clearly indicated the Pierponts had indeed sold the lot in its complete pre-s�ibdivision state, which matched the survey provided with the building permit request. Staff did not fiirther question this, as we were aware that both 1801 and 1849 had been recently provided with municipal se�ver, and therefore the alternate drainfield site for 1801, which was partially on the area originally proposed to be transferred from 1849 to 1801, was no lon�er needed. A buildin� pern7it was summarily issued. Subsequently, you advised me that the sale of the complete lot was an apparent eizor, and I am now advised that the Pieiponts wish to proceed to have the expired lot line rearrancement approvals renewed. Here is the process that must be followed: 1. Malce a formal application for Renewal of Subdivision Approval. The application for this is enclosed. Deadline for such application is Wednesday, January 1�, 2005 at 12:00 noon. Renewal fee is $300. VIost of the exhibits fi•om the original application can be re-used. You �vill have ta submit a ne�v property awners list. The Pierponts and the new owner of 1849 will have to subinit this as a joini application. 2, With that application, submit a title opinion for both properties in question, and submit an e�ecuted repiacement easement document.