My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
02-13-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2021 11:00:59 AM
Creation date
7/13/2015 1:33:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
524
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMORANI�UIVI <br /> To: Mike Gaffron <br /> Fromo Steve Bohl <br /> Date: January 20,2006 <br /> Re: MacKinnon Hill Proposal,Prelimiinar�y 1'lat Application (Revised) <br /> Revisions: Januaiy 20, 2006 <br /> 1. Following the meeting last BVednesday regarding the storm water/wetland <br /> issues we will be moving the storm water pond to east side of the wetland. Thi� was <br /> recommended by Renae from MCWD and appears to accomplish our need to <br /> minimize mitigation. <br /> We u�nderstand that any grading needed to create this storm water pond will need to <br /> be brought back to a candition that will appear natural. <br /> We will submit this to you for review as soon as complete. At that tiane we will also <br /> be submittang this application to MCWD, MCWD staff said they will complete the <br /> review and scheclnle for the Board af Managers meeting as soon as a preliminary <br /> plat is approved by Oa�ono. <br /> 2. We have shown the road at 24' in width as suggested in the Resolution. <br /> 3. Lot 3,Block 2 <br /> I have in�cluded a house plan and grading plan for this site. This is a plan that I will <br /> 6uild as a model for this lot. This will help us determine how we can best design this <br /> home on the lot. <br /> The grading plan for Lot 3, Block 2 has a 30' side setback on the south property <br /> line. Previous notes suggested 40',however with this grading plan it has a better <br /> solution for limiting gr-ading and retaining trees. <br /> 4. Regarding limiting grading on the rear yards for lots 1 & Z Block 3. I believe <br /> we can manage this by using best practices when we design the home. In ord�er to <br /> ensure that grades are not draanatically changed in the future I would suggest we <br /> include in the Covenants; <br /> Any boulder walls th�t are constructed (other than those used for a�alkaut grade <br /> next to the home) be limited to 3-4 ` in height. At no time may the rear yard <br /> retaining walis exceed 6 feet in height i� the effort to flatten out a back yard� <br /> 5. ltegarding the setbacks on I,ots 1-3,Block 1 for lim►iting uses around tl�e <br /> septic sites,I would like to limit to �25' setback froan the proposed sites that I <br /> believe is customary in Orono. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.