My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
01-23-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2015 1:04:53 PM
Creation date
7/13/2015 1:04:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 8-17-OS COUNCIL MEETING <br /> .�� Date Applicntion Considered as Complete: I 1-18-OS �AN 2 3 20�6 <br /> 120-Day Review Pcriod Gxpires: 3-17-06 <br /> � R�QU�ST FOR COUNCTL ACTION �ITY OF ORONO <br /> Date: January 19, 2006 <br /> Item No.: � <br /> Department Approval: Adm'nistrator Approval: Agenda Section: <br /> Name: Michael P. Gaffron �� Zoning <br /> Title: Planning Director � <br /> Item Description: #OS-3152 Bohland Development, Inc. - "3500" Watertown Road - <br /> Preliminary PRD Plat - Proposed Subdivision for New Lots <br /> Zoning District: RR-1B, 2.0-acre Single Fainily Rural Residential <br /> (2.0 ac. min., 200' width min., unsewered) <br /> Property Area: 14.28 Ac. Dry <br /> 2.43 Ac. Wetland <br /> 16.71 Ac. Total <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> A-Newest applicant submittals <br /> - Lot 6 Grading, Perspective Sketch <br /> - Revised Preliminary Grading Plan (discussed on January 18) <br /> B - Cotmcil Action Notice of 12/14/OS <br /> C - Council Minutes of 12/12/OS <br /> D - Memo and Selected Exhibits of 12/6/OS <br /> E - Draft Resolution <br /> Update <br /> Since tlie December 12 meeting applicant has: <br /> - provided concept sketches regarding the location, orientation and grading impacts for a <br /> proposed house on Lot 3, Block 2 (Eahibit A) <br /> - met with staff, City consultants, his own consultants and the MCWD in a meeting on <br /> January 18 to discuss the issues of placement of the stormwater pond witllin the <br /> designated wetland area. A number of options for relocating the pond were review and <br /> analyzed, each with its own set of positive and negative elements with regards to <br /> nlitigltion requirements, etc. This exploration of the various options resulted in a plan of <br /> attack that would potentially place the ponding to the southeast of the wetland at the base <br /> of the slope, if storm sewer can be routed to th�.t location. Applicant's engineer will <br /> ariempt to devise a t�iethod of accomplishing this. If he's not successful, MCWD has <br /> suggested this group analysis of all the alternatives may be a strong basis to ultimately <br /> support a variance to allow the ponding in the wetland. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.