My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-09-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
01-09-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2015 12:46:12 PM
Creation date
7/13/2015 12:45:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, December 12,2005 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (6. #OS-3131 STEVE BOHL OFBOHLAND DEVELOPMENT, INC., 190 WILLOyV <br /> DRII�E NORTHAND 177 GLENDALE DRIi�E, Co�atiircierl) <br /> Peterson stated the thought process that went into this area becoming higher density was to have liomes <br /> that would be more affordable. <br /> Gaffron stated the intent of the higher density was to match the density in the surroundiilg area. Gaffron <br /> noted tllere are a number of inodest homes in this area and that the intent was to provide some additional <br /> options for affordable hottsing. <br /> McMillan commented that she did not envision a 7,000 square foot home located on one of these lots. <br /> Bohl stated the 7,000 square foot house includes the garage and that the houses wil] typically be 2,300 to <br /> 2,400 square feet. <br /> Gaffron stated Lot 4, which is a 14,000 square foot lot,has a proposed house of 50' by 30' and a 35' by <br /> 30' garage, which totals 18 percent of 14,000 square feet, which exceeds the 15 percent. From an FAR <br /> standpoint,there is 1500 square feet on each floor, with 1050 square feet for the garage, which amounts to <br /> .4. Gaffron stated some lots would be over the 15 percent but would be under the .5 allowed under the <br /> FAR. <br /> Peteison stated the overall visual impact is the issue. <br /> Bohl illustrated on his sketch that tluee or four homes would be visible fi•om Willow Road. <br /> Murphy stated they appear like a one-story residence with a walkout, which is not as offensive as the two- <br /> story with a walkout. Murphy inquired whether this application could move forward given the concerns <br /> expressed by Council. Murphy recommended t11e applicaut look at this development from a <br /> topographical view to see if the concerns of the Council could be mitigated in some way. <br /> Gaffron suggested some computerized side views and elevation views be submitted. Gaffron stated the <br /> FAR could be reduced to something less than .5 to help keep the square footage of the house dovv�l. <br /> Gaffron suggested a more detailed screening plan also be provided. <br /> Peterson stated she would like to see screening around the entire development, with more screening being <br /> located wifllin this development. <br /> Moorse stated in terms of the walkout and the grade,when the grade is increased six to eight feet, it <br /> creates more of a visual impact,and that perh�ps the walkouts should Ue limited to one-story. Moorse <br /> stated to his recollection the walkouts on Glendale are one-story ramblers with a walkout. <br /> Boh] stated ]le would be willing to provide cross-sections of the homes, a screening plan of what the <br /> screening on the sotrthwest portion of the property would Ue,and then some images of the rear of the <br /> homes. <br /> Peterson inquired whether the applicant would be willing to provide a 60-day extension on this <br /> application. <br /> PAGE 11 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.