My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-23-2010 Council Work Session Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2010
>
03-23-2010 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 10:09:51 AM
Creation date
7/9/2015 1:12:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CMP Part 3B. Land Lise Plan <br /> the nearby Myrtlewood neighborhood. <br /> Basis for Amendment The 2000-2020 CMP indicates that to inore closely approach the development density goals <br /> established by Metropolitan Council,Orono has defined certain areas of the City where conversion from planned - <br /> Rural densities to planned Urban densities is appropriate. These are areas where provision of urban services can be <br /> efficient,cost-effective,and have the least negative impacts on the City's environmental goals and on surrounding <br /> development. In defining where urban areas should be located, the City considers proximity to existine hisher <br /> density development; proximity to existing municipal sewer lines with available capacity; proximity to existing � <br /> urban services;adjacency to existing transportation corridors;and location high in the watershed to limit stormwater <br /> impacts. <br /> Parcel Group 5 was not identified for change from Rural to Urban in the 2000-2020 CMP. Further.the 2000-2020 <br /> CMP establishes a number of policies which generally do not support the conversion of Rural land to Urban status. <br /> However.certain factors that suggest such a chan�e is appropriate for PG-5 include: <br /> I. The property is essentially an`orphan",with relatively little relationship to the development that surrounds it,i.e. <br /> it is surrounded on three sides by transportation eorridors (OId 12, NeN 12, Luce Line Trail); it is <br /> topographically disconnected from the primarily single family residential uses to the north; and it abuts a <br /> ceme[ery on the south. This lack of connectivity to surroundin� residential areas makes use of the site for a <br /> "family friendly"neighborhood unattractive and poorly marketable at best. <br /> 2. The potential for non-residential institutional,public or private uses for the site under the current Land Use Plan <br /> and low-density zoning is limited by the size of the site,and vehicular access limitations. <br /> 3. Vehicular access to the site has limitations due to existing and future expected traffic patterns and adjacent <br /> roadway configurations,suggesting that a low intensity residentiai use should be favored over potentially higher- <br /> intensity uses that might be available via a conditional use permit. <br /> 4. The property is at a location highly visible to traffic entering Orono from the east.Development at this site might <br /> be considered as a`main entrance'to Orono.and as such will inherently set a tone as to the character ofthe City, <br /> and therefore a visually low-intensity use of the site should be strived for. <br /> 5. The property abuts the Luce Line Trail,which as it traverses Orono has a completely different feel than it does in <br /> Plymouth to the east;a rural feel rather than a suburban feel. Development of a 40-�0 unit residential building <br /> rather than 9 individual buildings is anticipated to result in a more compact,centered footprint,not as spread out <br /> as the previously approved 9 single family homes. This has a potential to then retain more of the long views to <br /> the southwest enjoyed by trail users,given that those views are now of a freeway and railroad corridor. Due to <br /> the trail erossing of the freeway immediately west of the property,this is one of the very few locations in Orono <br /> traversed by the trail where denser development might not seem out of place. <br /> 6.Residential development at a density of 2 or more units per dry buildable acre would be inconsistent with existing <br /> and expected residential development surrounding the property.While the property in Long Lake to the north is <br /> zoned to ailow up to 4 units per acre, it has developed in the past with a wide range of lot sizes and at a <br /> substantially lower density than it is zoned for.The above factors suggest that this Iocation lends itself to a low- <br /> intensity,low-profile multi-family use such as senior assisted living.The traffic generated by this use would be <br /> limited, and the profile of the residents would not require immediate adjacency to most urban amenities. <br /> Therefore,development of such a use at a density of up to 10 dwellino units per acre would be appropriate for <br /> the site. � <br /> Planned Development Parameters <br /> Land Use Plan Amendment-2009 <br /> In addition to the permitted, conditional and accessory uses allowed within the RR-1B zoning district, this <br /> amendment allows for residential development of Parcel Group S at a density of^���-�'"�� '� ''?10-15 dwelling <br /> units per net dry buildable acre(i.e.exclusive of wetlands and required wetland buffersj.Based on the net area being <br /> 4.9 acres,this would allow a�minimum of�9�}3�units The following parameters shall be adhered to <br /> for any residential development of PG-S at a density greater than 0.�units per net dry buildable acre of land: � <br /> l. All dwellin� units shall be contained within a single residential building that shall not exceed two (2) , <br /> City of Orono Communih Nlanagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.