Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 9, 2019 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Walsh said he did not think they should be hooked because then you're setting yourself up. It is <br />something that has to get done, and it is on Riefs shoulders to get it done. <br />Crosby said he did not think it would be bad to draft some type of bonus structure for the performance <br />pay reviews on top of the COLA. <br />Walsh stated he would not put anything in writing because if you do that, you get into negotiation <br />problems with unions and they start saying, "Well, this is a built-in gift amount." <br />Printup added that even though they are separate, they are not separate. The unions will be keeping an eye <br />on everything. <br />Rief said the unions would make sure the money is paid out to them no matter what. <br />Mattick said when you negotiate union contracts, there is a provision in the statutes that talks about the <br />ability to negotiate backward for the term of the contract because communities were finding themselves <br />not settling contracts until they were six months into the new term. The law allows you to go back to <br />January 1. There is no such law for non -represented units, so there's a concern about can you legally go <br />back and retro someone who isn't part of a Collective Bargaining Agreement. He indicated if the Council <br />tables this, he would be cautious to make any sort of motion clear that the 3% is coming upon a successful <br />performance evaluation or whatever the Council chooses to do. It should not be deemed retro pay. <br />Walsh said the issue stands alone and the HR thing is separate and has to continue moving forward. <br />Seals said it feels like it is being brought in at the 11th hour so the Council has no choice because it's the <br />last meeting of the year. <br />Walsh said he did not feel it was the 11th hour because the Council has been talking about the unions and <br />dealing with the unions for months and the Council has talked about that it's going to be pretty much the <br />standard par with the non-union employees. <br />Seals agreed with Walsh's statement and added that it is not the 11th hour when it comes to performance <br />reviews because the Council has been asking for that for two -plus years. <br />Crosby stated performance reviews should not be tied to this. <br />Seal moved, Crosby seconded, to approve Resolution No. 7053, Cost Of Living Adjustments For <br />Non -Union Employees and also give Staff direction to give performance reviews in the first month <br />of January. VOTE: Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />CITY ATTORNEY REPORT <br />None. <br />Page 33 of 34 <br />