My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2020
>
01-13-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2020 3:24:24 PM
Creation date
3/20/2020 11:07:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 9, 2019 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Walsh confirmed he did and that it would be up to Mattick, understanding where the City Council is <br />going with it and with Staff knowing all the feedback. <br />Mattick said he does not necessarily hear a desire to take what's on the books off the books, but perhaps to <br />expand what is allowed in this particular situation. <br />Walsh stated the Council wants to give someone in the interior of an island, and dedicate what those <br />islands could possibly be, an easement from a neighbor to be able to get lake access. <br />Johnson added that is something everyone wants except one neighbor to the east. <br />Walsh stated it's a denial because it does not make any sense and he thinks everybody is in agreement. He <br />asked if everybody is in agreement to have Mattick work with Staff to come up with a very tight -knit <br />exception rule to the ordinance the City has, because the City has islands that have no roads or anything <br />else to them. <br />Barnhart suggested a table action and then let Staff come back with an ordinance that allows the direction <br />the Council has provided and then the City Council can make a decision based on two options available. <br />If it is denied and the Council does not end up approving an ordinance, the Council has taken away the <br />ability for the property owner to have the access. If there are a couple of options, Staff can move forward <br />before the City Council makes a final decision. <br />Walsh stated that would be fine. He did not think the City Council would approve it either way because of <br />the access. <br />Crosby asked why the City Council couldn't deny. <br />Walsh clarified Staff is saying leave the door open just in case something weird happens and the City <br />Council gives them access and says, "That's where you're going to have access" even though they don't <br />want it there. <br />Walsh responded in the affirmative. <br />Crosby said he did not see that happening. <br />Barnhart stated from a Staff perspective the concern is that the City Council is putting all of the ability for <br />this property owner to have access to her property through another property, and if they can't come to an <br />agreement, they don't have options available to them. <br />Walsh said it would be hard for them to come to an agreement until they know they have an ordinance <br />that lets them come to an agreement and tabling it doesn't hurt anybody. <br />Johnson asked if the Council is talking about amending the Code to allow anyone to do this. <br />Walsh said it would be for two particular islands and it would be very, very specific. <br />Johnson asked what the zoning district was. <br />Page 23 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.